Author:
Gove Jeffrey H.,Gregoire Timothy G.,Ducey Mark J.,Lynch Thomas B.
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe double sampling method known as “big BAF sampling” has been advocated as a way to reduce sampling effort while still maintaining a reasonably precise estimate of volume. A well-known method for variance determination, Bruce’s method, is customarily used because the volume estimator takes the form of a product of random variables. However, the genesis of Bruce’s method is not known to most foresters who use the method in practice.MethodsWe establish that the Taylor series approximation known as the Delta method provides a plausible explanation for the origins of Bruce’s method. Simulations were conducted on two different tree populations to ascertain the similarities of the Delta method to the exact variance of a product. Additionally, two alternative estimators for the variance of individual tree volume-basal area ratios, which are part of the estimation process, were compared within the overall variance estimation procedure.ResultsThe simulation results demonstrate that Bruce’s method provides a robust method for estimating the variance of inventories conducted with the big BAF method. The simulations also demonstrate that the variance of the mean volume-basal area ratios can be computed using either the usual sample variance of the mean or the ratio variance estimators with equal accuracy, which had not been shown previously for Big BAF sampling.ConclusionsA plausible explanation for the origins of Bruce’s method has been set forth both historically and mathematically in the Delta Method. In most settings, there is evidently no practical difference between applying the exact variance of a product or the Delta method—either can be used. A caution is articulated concerning the aggregation of tree-wise attributes into point-wise summaries in order to test the correlation between the two as a possible indicator of the need for further covariance augmentation.
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Forestry
Reference53 articles.
1. Arvanitis, LG, O’Regan WG (1967) Computer simulation and economic efficiency in forest sampling. Hilgardia 38(2):133–164.
2. Bailey, RL, Dell TR (1973) Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function. Forest Sci 19:97–104.
3. Barnett, HAR (1955) The variance of the product of two independent variables and its application to an investigation based on sample data. J Inst Actuar 81(2):190.
4. Bell, JF, Alexander LB (1957) Application of the variable plot method of sampling forest stands. Research Note 30, Oregon State Board of Forestry.
5. Bell, JF, Iles K, Marshall DD (1983) Balancing the ratio of tree count-only sample points and VBAR measurements in variable plot sampling. In: Bell JF Atterbury T (eds)Renewable resouce inventories for monitoring changes and trends, College of Forestry, 699–702, OSU, Corvallis, Oregon.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献