Abstract
AbstractA numerical model based on the finite element framework was developed to predict the seismic response of saturated sand under free-field conditions. The finite element framework used a non-linear coupled hypoplastic model based on the u-p formulation to simulate the behaviour of the saturated sand. The u-p coupled constitutive model was implemented as a user-defined routine in commercial ABAQUS explicit 6.14. Results of centrifuge experiments simulating seismic site response of a layered saturated sand system were used to validate the numerical results. The centrifuge test consisted of a three-layered saturated sand system subjected to one-dimensional seismic shaking at the base. The test set-up was equipped with accelerometers, pore pressure transducers, and LVDTs at various levels. Most of the constitutive models used to date for predicting the seismic response of saturated sands have underestimated volumetric strains even after choosing material parameters subjected to rigorous calibration measures. The hypoplastic model with intergranular strains calibrated against monotonic triaxial test results was able to effectively capture the volumetric strains, reasons for which are discussed in this paper. The comparison of the numerical results to centrifuge test data illustrates the capabilities of the developed u-p hypoplastic formulation to perform pore fluid analysis of saturated sand in ABAQUS explicit, which inherently lacks this feature.
Funder
German Academic Exchange Service New Delhi
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Mechanics of Materials,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference31 articles.
1. Taiebat M, Jeremić B, Kaynia AM (2009) Propagation of seismic waves through liquefied soils. Geotech Special Publication No. 186: Contemporary topics in in situ testing, analysis, and reliability of foundations. In: Iskander M, Laefer DF, Hussein MH (eds) Proceedings of the international foundations congress and equipment expo, Orlando, Florida, March 15–19, pp 198–205
2. Manzariand MT, Dafalias YF (1997) A critical state two-surface plasticity model for sands. Géotechnique 47(2):255–327
3. Kramer S, Arduino P (1999) Constitutive modeling of cyclic mobility and implications for site response. In: Sêco e Pinto PS (ed) Proceedings of 2nd international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Issue 3, pp 1029–1034
4. Dafalias YF, Manzari MT (2004) Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects. J Eng Mech 130(6):622–634
5. Boulanger RW, Ziotopoulou K (2015) PM4Sand (Version 3): a sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications. Report No UCD/CGM-15/01. Center for Geotechnical Modeling, University of California, Davis
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献