Early and mid-term outcome in terms of functional and hemodynamic performance of the st. Jude regent 19-mm aortic mechanical prosthesis versus 19-mm carpentier edwards aortic biological prosthesis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Early and mid-term outcome in terms of functional and hemodynamic performance of the st. Jude regent 19-mm aortic mechanical prosthesis versus 19-mm carpentier edwards aortic biological prosthesis

Published:2015-11-06 Issue:1 Volume:10 Page:
ISSN:1749-8090
Container-title:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:J Cardiothorac Surg

Author:

Prifti Edvin,Bonacchi Massimo,Ademaj Fadil,Giunti Gabriele,Esposito Giampiero,Baboci Arben,Bajraktari Gani,Veshti Altin,Demiraj Aurel,Vanini Vittorio

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13019-015-0361-3.pdf

Reference33 articles.

1. Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Garcia-Acuna JM, Vega Fernandez M, Amaro Cendon A, Castelo Fuentes V, Garcia-Bengoechea JB, et al. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:273–80.

2. Medalion B, Lytle BW, McCarthy PM, Stewart RW, Arheart KL, Arnold JH, et al. Aortic valve replacement for octogenarians: Are small valves bad? Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:699–705.

3. Sawant D, Singh AK, Feng WC, Bert AA, Rotenberg F. Nineteen-millimeter aortic St. Jude Medical heart valve prosthesis: up to sixteen years’ follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:964–70.

4. Izzat MB, Kadir I, Reeves B, Wilde P, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Patient-prosthesis mismatch is negligible with modern small-size aortic valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68(5):1657–60.

5. Hanayama N, Christakis GT, Mallidi HR, Joyner CD, Fremes SE, Morgan CD, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73(6):1822–929.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Long-term outcomes of mechanical versus biological aortic valve prosthesis: Systematic review and meta-analysis;The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery;2019-09

2. A meta-analysis of the performance of small tissue versus mechanical aortic valve prostheses;European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery;2019-02-27

3. PROSTHESIS OF AORTIC VALVE BY STENTED AND STENTLESS BIOLOGICAL PROSTHESES: INTERMEDIATE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS;Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery;2017-08-28

4. Long-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement with small biological and mechanical prostheses;Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya;2017

5. Multimorbidity is strongly associated with long-term but not short-term mortality after cardiac valve replacement;International Journal of Cardiology;2016-07