Author:
Nhat Lam Xuan,Vinh Vu Huu,Thi Chau Phu,Van Khoi Nguyen
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The present descriptive study shares the overall experience of treating all these patients where different surgical process was adopted depending on the treatment required after carefully evaluating the risk factors and comorbidities.
Methods
The present study was conducted at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Choray Hospital, Vietnam between the period of 2010 to 2020. We have treated 95 patients altogether in this duration.
Results
We were able to save most of the patients by applying thoracotomy and thoracic irrigation for most of the patients based on the observed indications that were identified immediately after the compulsory standard cervicotomy. The indication for thoracic interference was considered when the infection was deeply spread into the mediastinum and cannot get out through cervicotomy, although the most effective method of drainage was applied.
Conclusion
Our statistical investigation of the patient data suggested the possible association and influence of comorbidity such as diabetes. Therefore, we recommend that in specific cases thoracotomy along with thoracic irrigation and repetitive surgical draining could be a better option to reduce the infection and the mortality rate.
Trial registration
Retrospectively registered.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献