The use of Transcollation Technology for Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery lobectomy
-
Published:2020-07-28
Issue:1
Volume:15
Page:
-
ISSN:1749-8090
-
Container-title:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Cardiothorac Surg
Author:
Menna Cecilia, Poggi Camilla, Andreetti Claudio, Ciccone Anna Maria, Baccarini Alberto Emiliano, Maurizi Giulio, D’Andrilli Antonio, Vanni Camilla, Cascone Roberto, Fiorelli AlfonsoORCID, Santini Mario, Venuta Federico, Rendina Erino Angelo, Ibrahim Mohsen
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS) lobectomy is now considered the preferred approach at many centers for early stage lung cancer. However, it needs an adequate learning curve, and it may be challenging in non-expert hands. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Transcollation Technology over Traditional Electrocautery to perform hilar and mediastinal dissection during VATS lobectomy.
Methods
This is a single-center retrospective study including consecutive patients undergoing VATS lobectomy for lung cancer. Patients were divided in two groups based on whether Transcollation Technology (TT Group) or Traditional Electrocautery (TE Group) was used for hilar and mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Operative time and surgical outcome, including number of transfusions, length of chest drainage, length of hospital stay, morbidity and mortality were registered, and the inter-group differences were statistically analyzed.
Results
53 patients were included in the final analysis. The TT Group (n = 24) compared to the TE Group (n = 29) showed significant shorter operative time (75.2 ± 25.8 min versus 98.1 ± 33.3 min; p = 0.023), and reduction of length of chest tube stay (4.7 ± 0.8 days vs. 6.8 ± 1.1 days, p = 0.013) and length of hospital stay (5.3 ± 1.9 days vs. 6.8 ± 1.1 days, p = 0.007). No intraoperative or major postoperative complications were observed in either groups.
Conclusions
Transcollation Technology represents a valid alternative to standard electrocautery instruments during VATS lobectomy. It contributes to reduce the operative time and length of hospital stay. Further larger prospective studies are required to confirm our data.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Reference17 articles.
1. Fiorelli A, Caronia FP, Daddi N, Loizzi D, Ampollini L, Ardò N, Ventura L, Carbognani P, Potenza R, Ardissone F, Sollitto F, Mattioli S, Puma F, Santini M, Ragusa M. Sub lobar resection versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: an appropriate choice in elderly patients? Surg Today. 2016;46(12):1370–82. 2. Hansen HJ, Petersen RH. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy using a standardized three-port anterior approach – the Copenhagen experience. AnnCardiothoracSurg. 2012;1(1):70–6. 3. Caronia FP, Fiorelli A, Ruffini E, Nicolosi M, Santini M, Lo Monte AI. A comparative analysis of Pancoast tumour resection performed via video-assisted thoracic surgery versus standard open approaches. InteractCardiovascThoracSurg. 2014;19(3):426–35. 4. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Paradela M, Fernandez R, Delgado M, Fieira E, Mendez L, Velasco C, de la Torre M. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: two years of experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(2):426–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.10.070 Epub 2012 Dec 5. 5. Ibrahim M, Menna C, Andreetti C, D'Andrilli A, Ciccone AM, Maurizi G, Cassiano F, Rendina EA. Flexible videoscope for thoracoscopic lobectomy: evolution of uniportal technique. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(7):2056–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3865-3 Epub 2014 Oct 8.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|