Bedside zero-fluoroscopy temporary permanent pacemaker implantation in the electrical storm treatment under the guidance of EnSite 3D system: a case report-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Bedside zero-fluoroscopy temporary permanent pacemaker implantation in the electrical storm treatment under the guidance of EnSite 3D system: a case report

Published:2024-02-06 Issue:1 Volume:19 Page:
ISSN:1749-8090
Container-title:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:J Cardiothorac Surg

Author:

Wang Lei,Li Pengfei,li Jun,Xi Jicheng,Zhang Zhibiao,Yan Fang,Zhang Yanan,Wang Haixiong,Han Huiyuan

Abstract

Abstract Background Electrical storm (ES) is a clinical emergency characterized by multiple malignant ventricular arrhythmias or ICD discharges within 24 h, requiring early rational management. Case presentation We report a 55-year-old man who underwent aortic valve replacement experienced recurrent ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. A temporary permanent pacemaker with the EnSite system was implanted, and significant inhibition of the electrical storm, attributed to the atrial overdrive pacing, ensued. Conclusions In emergency regarding an electrical storm, the bedside temporary permanent pacemaker implantation with the EnSite system is concluded to be feasible and safe.

Funder

Shanxi Provincial Natural Science Basic Research Program

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13019-024-02579-0.pdf

Reference14 articles.

1. Elsokkari I, Tsuji Y, Sapp JL, Nattel S. Recent insights into mechanisms and clinical approaches to Electrical Storm. Can J Cardiol. 2022;38(4):439–53.

2. Kurisu S, Inoue I, Kawagoe T, Ishihara M, Shimatani Y, Mitsuba N, Hata T, Nakama Y, Kisaka T, Kijima Y. Temporary overdriving pacing as an adjunct to antiarrhythmic drug therapy for electrical storm in acute myocardial infarction. Circ J. 2005;69(5):613–6.

3. Braun MU, Rauwolf T, Bock M, Kappert U, Boscheri A, Schnabel A, Strasser RH. Percutaneous lead implantation connected to an external device in stimulation-dependent patients with systemic infection–a prospective and controlled study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29(8):875–9.

4. Hasegawa T, Tachibana T, Kimura H, Yazaki Y. Successful treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock and electrical storm using the IMPELLA 5.0 with Atrial Overdrive Pacing, in a patient with severe peripheral arterial disease. Int Heart J. 2021;62(3):677–81.

5. Suarez K, Banchs JE. A review of Temporary Permanent pacemakers and a comparison with Conventional Temporary pacemakers. J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2019;10(5):3652–61.