Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Space limitations during minimally invasive cardiac surgery impede consistent use of CO2 field-flooding. We compared different gas delivery methods, flow rates and the effect of patient inclination.
Methods
A gastight model of MICS surgery with internal organs and right thoracotomy wound was created from a mannequin and equipped with a CO2 concentration sensor in the left ventricle. Maximum achievable CO2 concentration was compared for gas delivery via three commercial CO2 diffusors (CarbonMini, Temed, Andocor) and also via a trocar with side port. Gas flow rates of 1, 3, 5 and 8 L per minute were tested. The model was placed either in supine position or with 20° oblique tilt. A simplified transparent model was also created and placed in an optical test bench to evaluate the gas cloud motions via real-time visualization.
Results
The trocar consistently achieved higher CO2 concentrations inside the left ventricle. At 1 l/min, approximately 2.5 min were needed to fill the supine model to its maximum CO2 concentration, which was limited to a range of 48–82% in the left ventricle. At higher flow rates, filling time and concentration were significantly improved. In a tilted model, all devices and all flow rates generated on average 99% CO2 in the ventricle. Imaging revealed constant gas exchange via the main incision, with CO2 outflow via bottom and air inflow via the top of the incision.
Conclusions
CO2 field flooding in minimally invasive cardiac surgery is highly effective if the patient is tilted. Else a flow rate of 5 l/min is recommended to achieve the same protection.
Funder
Innosuisse - Schweizerische Agentur für Innovationsförderung
Schweizerische Herzstiftung
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Reference12 articles.
1. Orihashi K, Ueda T. “De-airing” in open heart surgery: report from the CVSAP nation-wide survey and literature review. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;67(10):823–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-019-01168-6.
2. Chung EML, Banahan C, Patel N, et al. Size distribution of air bubbles entering the brain during cardiac surgery. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122166.
3. Skidmore KL, Jones C, DeWet C. Flooding the surgical field with carbon dioxide during open heart surgery improves segmental wall motion. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38(2):123–7.
4. Patel N, Banahan C, Janus J, et al. Neurological impact of emboli during adult cardiac surgery. J Neurol Sci. 2020;416(June): 117006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2020.117006.
5. Patel N, Horsfield MA, Banahan C, et al. Impact of perioperative infarcts after cardiac surgery. Stroke. 2015;46(3):680–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007533.