Abstract
Abstract
Background
Our human societies and certainly also (bio) medicine are more and more permeated with technology. There seems to be an increasing awareness among bioethicists that an effective and comprehensive approach to ethically guide these emerging biomedical innovations into society is needed. Such an approach has not been spelled out yet for bioethics, while there are frequent calls for ethical guidance of biomedical innovation, also by biomedical researchers themselves. New and emerging biotechnologies require anticipation of possible effects and implications, meaning the scope is not evaluative after a technology has been fully developed or about hypothetical technologies, but real-time for a real biotechnology.
Main text
In this paper we aim to substantiate and discuss six ingredients that we increasingly see adopted by ethicists and that together constitute “ethics parallel research”. This approach allows to fulfil two aims: guiding the development process of technologies in biomedicine and providing input for the normative evaluation of such technologies. The six ingredients of ethics parallel research are: (1) disentangling wicked problems, (2) upstream or midstream ethical analysis, (3) ethics from within, (4) inclusion of empirical research, (5) public participation and (6) mapping societal impacts, including hard and soft impacts. We will draw on gene editing, organoid technology and artificial intelligence as examples to illustrate these six ingredients.
Conclusion
Ethics parallel research brings together these ingredients to ethically analyse and proactively or parallel guide technological development. It widens the roles and judgements from the ethicist to a more anticipatory and constructively guiding role. Ethics parallel research is characterised by a constructive, rather than a purely critical perspective, it focusses on developing best-practices rather than outlining worst practice, and draws on insights from social sciences and philosophy of technology.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health(social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference44 articles.
1. Toulmin S. How medicine saved the life of ethics. Perspect Biol Med. 1982;25(4):736–50.
2. Caplan A. Done good. J Med Ethics. 2015;41:25–7.
3. Jonsen AR. The birth of bioethics. USA: Oxford University Press; 2003.
4. Bijker WE. The vulnerability of technological culture. In: Nowotny H, editor. Cultures of technology and the quest for innovation. New York: Berghahn Books; 2006.
5. Van de Poel I, Royakkers L. Ethics, technology, and engineering. Oxford: Wiley; 2011.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献