Abstract
Abstract
Background
Literature on issues relating to comprehension during the process of obtaining informed consent (IC) has largely focused on the challenges potential participants can face in understanding the IC documents, and the strategies used to enhance comprehension of those documents. In this review, we set out to describe the factors that have an impact on comprehension and the strategies used to enhance the IC process in sub-Saharan African countries.
Methods
From November 2021 to January 2022, we conducted a literature search using a PRISMA tool. We searched electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCOHOST) to identify relevant peer reviewed studies. We then reviewed the references of these articles to find additional literature that might have been missed through the initial search. We were particularly interested in full text articles in English that focused on the IC process in SSA published between 2006 and 2020. We included systematic reviews, and studies from Western and Asian countries that included data about SSA. We excluded articles that focused on medical interventions and studies that did not require IC.
Results
Out of the 50 studies included most were multi-country (n = 13) followed by single country studies in South Africa (n = 12); Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda (n = 5) each; Gambia, Ghana and Nigeria (n = 2)each ; and one each for Botswana, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique. We identified three areas of focus: (1) socio-cultural factors affecting IC; (2) gaps in the ethical and legal frameworks guiding the IC process; and (3) strategies used to improve participants’ understanding of IC.
Conclusion
Our review showed wide recognition that the process of achieving IC in SSA is inherently challenging, and there are limitations in the strategies aimed at improving comprehension in IC. We suggest that there is a need for greater flexibility and negotiation with communities to ensure that the approach to IC is suited to the diverse socio-cultural contexts. We propose moving beyond the literal translations and technical language to understanding IC comprehension from the participants’ perspectives and the researchers’ views, while examining contextual factors that impact the IC process.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference78 articles.
1. Marshall PA. UNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases & World Health Organization. TDR/SDR/SEB/ST/07.1. Special Topics in Social, Economic, and Behavioral Research report; No.5. World Health Organization. 2007. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43622.
2. Laurie G, Postan E. Rhetoric or reality: what is the legal status of the consent form in health related research? Med Law Rev. 2013;21:371–414.
3. Aderibigbe KS, Chima SC. Knowledge and practice of informed consent by physiotherapists and therapy assistants in Kwazulu-Natal Province, South Africa. South Afr J Physiotherapy. 2019;75(1):1–10.
4. Adams V, Miller S, Craig S, Nyima, Sonam D, et al. The challenge of cross-cultural clinical trials research: Case Report from the Tibetan Autonomous Region, people’s Republic of China. Med Anthropol Q. 2005;19(3):267–89.
5. Bull S, Farsides B, Ayele FT. Tailoring information provision and consent processes to research contexts: the value of rapid assessments. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012;7(1):37–52.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献