Author:
Fahim Ayesha,Sadaf Aysha,Jafari Fahim Haider,Siddique Kashif,Sethi Ahsan
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Intellectual honesty and integrity are the cornerstones of conducting any form of research. Over the last few years, scholars have shown great concerns over questionable research practices (QRPs) in academia. This study aims to investigate the questionable research practices amongst faculty members of medical and dental colleges in Pakistan.
Method
A descriptive multi-institutional online survey was conducted from June-August 2022. Based on previous studies assessing research misconduct, 43 questionable research practices in four domains: Data collection & storage, Data analysis, Study reporting and Collaboration & authorship were identified and investigated. Descriptive (Frequencies, Percentages, Mean, SD) and Inferential (chi square) statistics were calculated.
Results
A total of 654 faculty members responded. Every respondent reported committing at least one QRP in their career. The most common QRPs included deliberately failing to mention funding, publishing program evaluation data not meant for research purposes or approved by an ethical body, inappropriately storing identifiable information and non-disclosure of any conflicts. There was significant association of age, gender and academic rank with QRPs in ‘Data collection and storage’ and ‘Data Analysis’ domains.
Conclusion
Medical and dental faculty members participating in this study are involved in a range of questionable research practices (QRPs) in Pakistan. Their confession might have contributed to the faculty developing self-awareness and reinforcing academic integrity. There is a need for reviewing policies and practices to improve research culture. Future research should explore the factors resulting in such practices.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Gostin LO, Levit LA, Nass SJ. Beyond the HIPAA privacy rule: enhancing privacy, improving health through research. National Academies Press; 2009.
2. Dobrow MJ, Miller FA, Frank C. Brown ADJHrp, systems. Understanding relevance of health research. Considerations in the Context of Research Impact Assessment. 2017;15(1):1–9.
3. Heflin MT, DeMeo S, Nagler A, Hockenberry MJ. Health Professions Education Research and the Institutional Review Board. Nurse Educ. 2016;41(2):55–9.
4. Steneck NHJS. ethics e. Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. 2006;12(1):53–74.
5. Zikria BA. Adab-Al-Tabib. The J IMA. 1981;13:79–80.