Author:
Krawutschke Robin,Pastrana Tania,Schmitz Dagmar
Abstract
Abstract
Background
While most countries that allow abortion on women’s request also grant physicians a right to conscientious objection (CO), this has proven to constitute a potential barrier to abortion access. Conscientious objection is regarded as an understudied phenomenon the effects of which have not yet been examined in Germany. Based on expert interviews, this study aims to exemplarily reconstruct the processes of abortion in a mid-sized city in Germany, and to identify potential effects of conscientious objection.
Methods
Five semi-structured interviews with experts from all instances involved have been conducted in April 2020. The experts gave an insight into the medical care structures with regard to abortion procedures, the application and manifestations of conscientious objection in medical practice, and its impact on the care of pregnant women. A content analysis of the transcribed interviews was performed.
Results
Both the procedural processes and the effects of conscientious objection are reported to differ significantly between early abortions performed before the 12th week of pregnancy and late abortions performed at the second and third trimester. Conscientious objection shows structural consequences as it is experienced to further reduce the number of possible providers, especially for early abortions. On the individual level of the doctor-patient relationship, the experts confirmed the neutrality and patient-orientation of the vast majority of doctors. Still, it is especially late abortions that seem to be vulnerable to barriers imposed by conscientious objection in individual medical encounters.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that conscientious objection possibly imposes barriers to both early and late abortion provision and especially in the last procedural steps, which from an ethical point of view is especially problematic. To oblige hospitals to partake in abortion provision in Germany has the potential to prevent negative impacts of conscientious objection on women’s rights on an individual as well as on a structural level.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. United Nations - Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General comment No. 22 (2016) on the right to sexual and reproductive health 2016. Document No.: E/C.12/GC/22. Available from: https://undocs.org/en/E/C.12/GC/22 Accessed 20 Feb 2023.
2. United Nations. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966. Document No.: U.N. Doc. A/6316. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights Accessed 20 Feb 2023.
3. Dworkin R. Life’s dominion. An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. New York: Vintage Books; 1993.
4. World Health Organization. Global Abortion Policies Database. 2018.Aavailable from: https://abortion-policies.srhr.org/. Accessed 20 Feb 2023.
5. Ortiz-Millan G. Abortion and conscientious objection: rethinking conflicting rights in the Mexican context. Glob Bioeth. 2018;29(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2017.1411224.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献