Conscientious objection and barriers to abortion within a specific regional context - an expert interview study

Author:

Krawutschke Robin,Pastrana Tania,Schmitz Dagmar

Abstract

Abstract Background While most countries that allow abortion on women’s request also grant physicians a right to conscientious objection (CO), this has proven to constitute a potential barrier to abortion access. Conscientious objection is regarded as an understudied phenomenon the effects of which have not yet been examined in Germany. Based on expert interviews, this study aims to exemplarily reconstruct the processes of abortion in a mid-sized city in Germany, and to identify potential effects of conscientious objection. Methods Five semi-structured interviews with experts from all instances involved have been conducted in April 2020. The experts gave an insight into the medical care structures with regard to abortion procedures, the application and manifestations of conscientious objection in medical practice, and its impact on the care of pregnant women. A content analysis of the transcribed interviews was performed. Results Both the procedural processes and the effects of conscientious objection are reported to differ significantly between early abortions performed before the 12th week of pregnancy and late abortions performed at the second and third trimester. Conscientious objection shows structural consequences as it is experienced to further reduce the number of possible providers, especially for early abortions. On the individual level of the doctor-patient relationship, the experts confirmed the neutrality and patient-orientation of the vast majority of doctors. Still, it is especially late abortions that seem to be vulnerable to barriers imposed by conscientious objection in individual medical encounters. Conclusion Our findings indicate that conscientious objection possibly imposes barriers to both early and late abortion provision and especially in the last procedural steps, which from an ethical point of view is especially problematic. To oblige hospitals to partake in abortion provision in Germany has the potential to prevent negative impacts of conscientious objection on women’s rights on an individual as well as on a structural level.

Funder

RWTH Aachen University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference46 articles.

1. United Nations - Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. General comment No. 22 (2016) on the right to sexual and reproductive health 2016. Document No.: E/C.12/GC/22. Available from: https://undocs.org/en/E/C.12/GC/22 Accessed 20 Feb 2023.

2. United Nations. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966. Document No.: U.N. Doc. A/6316. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights Accessed 20 Feb 2023.

3. Dworkin R. Life’s dominion. An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. New York: Vintage Books; 1993.

4. World Health Organization. Global Abortion Policies Database. 2018.Aavailable from: https://abortion-policies.srhr.org/. Accessed 20 Feb 2023.

5. Ortiz-Millan G. Abortion and conscientious objection: rethinking conflicting rights in the Mexican context. Glob Bioeth. 2018;29(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2017.1411224.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3