Author:
Dedivitis Rogério Aparecido,de Matos Leandro Luongo,de Castro Mario Augusto Ferrari,de Castro Andrea Anacleto Ferrari,Giaxa Renata Rocha,Tempski Patrícia Zen
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Doctors are increasingly faced with end-of-life decisions. Little is known about how medical students approach euthanasia. The objective of this study was to evaluate, among medical students and residents, the view on euthanasia and its variants; correlate such a view with empathy and religiosity/spiritualism; and with the stages of medical training in Brazil.
Methods
This is an exploratory cross-sectional study using an online questionnaire to be filled out on a voluntary basis among medical students and residents, consisting of: socio-demographic data, an empathy questionnaire and questions with elaborate clinical cases that typify situations of the variants of euthanasia.
Results
From 1550 invitations, 273 volunteer participants responded (17.6%). The percentages of strong agreement/agreement on the concepts were: passive euthanasia (72.9%); active euthanasia (22.3%), orthothanasia (90.1%), dysthanasia (18.7%), assisted suicide (33%) and sedation (82.8%). Passive euthanasia, active euthanasia, dysthanasia and assisted suicide showed greater refusal with increasing length of medical training. Religious belief and degree of empathy did not significantly influence the opinion about the concepts. Strong agreement/agreement were: passive euthanasia (72.9%); active euthanasia (22.3%), orthothanasia (90.1%), dysthanasia (18.7%), assisted suicide (33%) and sedation (82.8%).
Conclusions
Passive euthanasia, active euthanasia, dysthanasia and assisted suicide showed greater refusal with increasing length of medical training. The external validation of our findings relies on the distinct legal, cultural, and religious frameworks found across various countries.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference30 articles.
1. Müller-Busch HC, Oduncu FS, Woskanjan S, Klaschik E. Attitudes on euthanasia, physician-assisted Suicide and terminal sedation—a survey of the members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine. Med Health Care Philos. 2004;7:333–9.
2. Lopes AC, Lima CAS, Santoro LF. Eutanásia, ortotanásia e distanásia – Aspectos médicos e jurídicos (3a ed.) São Paulo: Atheneu.pp.203.
3. Reynolds S, Cooper AB, McKneally M. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: ethical considerations. Thorac Surg Clin. 2005;15:469–80.
4. Caralis PV, Hammond JS. Attitudes of medical students, housestaff, and faculty physicians toward euthanasia and termination of life-sustaining treatment. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:683–90.
5. Paro HBMS, Daud-Gallotti RM, Tibério IC, Pinto RMC, Martins MA. Brazilian version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy: psychometric properties and factor analysis. MC Med Educ. 2012;12:73.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献