Abstract
Abstract
Background
As opioid use disorder (OUD) incidence and its associated deaths continue to persist at elevated rates, the development of novel treatment modalities is warranted. Recent strides in this therapeutic area include novel anti-opioid vaccine approaches. This work compares logistical and ethical considerations surrounding currently available interventions for opioid use disorder with an anti-opioid vaccine approach.
Methods
The opinions of student pharmacists and practicing pharmacists assessing knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward current and future OUD management strategies were characterized using a staged, multi-modal research approach incorporating a focus group, pilot survey development and refinement, and final survey deployment. Survey responses were assessed using one- and two-way parametric and non-parametric analyses where appropriate, and multi-dimensional matrix profiles were compared using z-tests following an exhaustive combinatorial sum of differences calculation between items within each compared matrix.
Results
Focus group content analysis revealed a high level of agreeableness among participants regarding anti-opioid vaccine technology and a sense of shared ownership regarding solutions to the opioid epidemic at large. Pilot survey results demonstrated subject ability to consider both pragmatic and ethical considerations related to current therapeutics and novel interventions in a single instrument, with high endurance amongst engaged subjects. Access inequality was the most concerning ethical consideration identified for anti-opioid vaccines. Support for anti-opioid vaccine implementation across various clinical scenarios was strongest for voluntary use amongst individuals in recovery, and lowest for mandatory use in at-risk individuals.
Conclusions
Ethical and logistical concerns surrounding anti-opioid vaccines were largely similar to those for current OUD therapeutics overall. Anti-opioid vaccines were endorsed as helpful potential additions to current OUD therapeutic approaches, particularly for voluntary use in the later stages of clinical progression.
Funder
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health(social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference54 articles.
1. Baehr C, Pravetoni M. Vaccines to treat opioid use disorders and to reduce opioid overdoses. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44(1):217–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0197-3.
2. Petruzzelli M. About the National Council SAMHSA releases national survey on drug use and Health. https://www.thenationalcouncil.org/capitol-connector/2018/09/samhsa-releases-national-survey-on-drug-use-and-health/.
3. DiPiro JT, Talbert RL, Yee GC, Matzke GR, Wells BG, Posey LM, Ellingrod VL, Haines ST, Nolin TD. Pharmacotherapy: a pathophysiologic approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2017.
4. DHHS. Opioid overdoses accounted for more than 42, 000 deaths in 2016, more than any previous year on record. An estimated 40% of opioid overdose deaths involved a prescription opioid. https://www.hhs.gov/opioids/about-the-epidemic/index.html. Accessed November 2019. No Title.
5. Dicken-Kano R, Bell MM. Pharmaceutical overdose deaths, United States, 2010. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19(5):524–5. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.5.524.study.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献