An ethical issue: nurses’ conscientious objection regarding induced abortion in South Korea

Author:

Ko Chung Mee,Koh Chin KangORCID,Lee Ye Sol

Abstract

Abstract Background The Constitutional Court of South Korea declared that an abortion ban was unconstitutional on April 11, 2019. The National Health Care System will provide abortion care across the country as a formal medical service. Conscientious objection is an issue raised during the construction of legal reforms. Methods One hundred sixty-seven perioperative nurses responded to the survey questionnaire. Nurses’ perception about conscientious objection, support of legislation regarding conscientious objection, and intention to object were measured. Logistic regression was used to explore the factors associated with support of the legislation and the intention to conscientiously object. Results Only 28.8% of the responding nurses were aware of health care professionals’ conscientious objection. The majority (68.7%) felt that patients’ rights should be prioritized over health care professionals’ conscientious objection. On the other hand, 45.8% supported the legislation on conscientious objection to abortion, and 42.5% indicated a willingness to refuse to participate in an abortion case if conscientious objection was permitted. Religion, awareness of conscientious objection, and prioritizing of nurses’ right to conscientious objection were significantly associated with supporting the legislation. Moreover, religion and prioritizing nurses' rights were significantly associated with the intention to conscientiously object. Conclusions This study provides information necessary for further discussion of nurses’ conscientious objection. Nursing leaders, researchers, and educators should appeal to nurses and involve them in making policies that balance a women's right to non-discrimination and to receiving appropriate care with nurses' rights to maintain their moral integrity without compromising their professional obligation.

Funder

Sungshin Women's University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health(social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference34 articles.

1. National Law Information Center. Constitutional Court 2017Hun-ba 127. 2019. https://www.law.go.kr/detcInfoP.do?mode=1&detcSeq=150780. Accessed 1 Aug 2020.

2. Kim S, Young N, Lee Y. The role of reproductive justice movements in challenging South Korea’s abortion ban. Health Hum Rights. 2019;21:97–107.

3. The Ministry of Law. Criminal Act. n.d. https://www.law.go.kr/engLsSc.do?menuId=1&subMenuId=21&query=%ED%98%95%EB%B2%95#. Accessed 1 Aug 2020.

4. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. National Survey on Abortion 2018. https://www.kihasa.re.kr/web/news/report/view.do?menuId=20&tid=51&bid=79&ana=10778. Accessed 5 Aug 2020.

5. The Ministry of Law. Medical Service Act. n.d. https://www.law.go.kr/engLsSc.do?menuId=1&subMenuId=21&query=%EC%9D%98%EB%A3%8C%EB%B2%95#. Accessed 5 Aug 2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3