Abstract
Abstract
Background
Personal Health Monitoring (PHM) has the potential to enhance soldier health outcomes. To promote morally responsible development, implementation, and use of PHM in the armed forces, it is important to be aware of the inherent ethical dimension of PHM. In order to improve the understanding of the ethical dimension, a scoping review of the existing academic literature on the ethical dimension of PHM was conducted.
Methods
Four bibliographical databases (Ovid/Medline, Embase.com, Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection, and Elsevier/SCOPUS) were searched for relevant literature from their inception to June 1, 2023. Studies were included if they sufficiently addressed the ethical dimension of PHM and were related to or claimed relevance for the military. After selection and extraction, the data was analysed using a qualitative thematic approach.
Results
A total of 9,071 references were screened. After eligibility screening, 19 articles were included for this review. The review identifies and describes three categories reflecting the ethical dimension of PHM in the military: (1) utilitarian considerations, (2) value-based considerations, and (3) regulatory responsibilities. The four main values that have been identified as being of concern are those of privacy, security, trust, and autonomy.
Conclusions
This review demonstrates that PHM in the armed forces is primarily approached from a utilitarian perspective, with a focus on its benefits, without explicit critical deliberation on PHM’s potential moral downsides. Also, the review highlights a significant research gap with a specific lack of empirical studies focussing specifically on the ethical dimension of PHM. Awareness of the inherent ethical dimension of PHM in the military, including value conflicts and how to balance them, can help to contribute to a morally responsible development, implementation, and use of PHM in the armed forces.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Friedl KE. Military applications of soldier physiological monitoring. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(11):1147–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2018.06.004.
2. Stacey MJ, Hill N, Woods D. Physiological monitoring for healthy military personnel. J R Army Med Corps. 2018;164(4):290–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2017-000851.
3. Van den Bulk S. Altijd een vinger aan de pols. Landmacht. 2019. http://magazines.defensie.nl/landmacht/2019/08/10_cde_08-2019. Accessed 12 May 2023.
4. Van Haren RM, Thorson CM, Valle EJ, Busko AM, Jouria JM, Livingstone AS, et al. Novel prehospital monitor with injury acuity alarm to identify trauma patients who require lifesaving intervention. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):743–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000000099.
5. Valk PJ, Veenstra BJ. Military performance and health monitoring in extreme environments. HFM-181 symposium on human performance enhancement for NATO military operations (Science, Technology and Ethics). Sofia; 2009.