Abstract
Abstract
Background
Compensating participants of biomedical research is a common practice. However, its proximity with ethical concerns of coercion, undue influence, and exploitation, demand that participant compensation be regulated. The objective of this paper is to discuss the current regulations for compensation of research participants in Malawi and how they can be improved in relation to ethical concerns of coercion, undue influence, and exploitation.
Main text
In Malawi, national regulations recommend that research subjects be compensated with a stipend of US$10 per study visit. However, no guidance is provided on how this figure was determined and how it should be implemented. While necessary to prevent exploitation, the stipend may expose the very poor to undue influence. The stipend may also raise the cost of doing research disadvantaging local researchers and may have implications on studies where income stipend is the intervention under investigation. We recommend that development and implementation of guidelines of this importance involve interested parties such as the research community and patient groups.
Conclusion
Compensating human research subjects is important but can also act as a barrier to voluntary participation and good research efforts. Deliberate measures need to be put in place to ensure fair compensation of research participants, avoid their exploitation and level the field for locally funded research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference26 articles.
1. Gordon SB, Chinula L, Chilima B, Mwapasa V, Dadabhai S, Mlombe Y. A Malawi guideline for research study participant remuneration. Wellcome open Res. 2018;3:141.
2. Grady C. Payment of clinical research subjects. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(7):1681–7.
3. Largent EA, Fernandez LH. Paying research participants: regulatory uncertainty, conceptual confusion, and a path forward. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2017;17(1):61–141.
4. Resnik BDB. “ Happy Trials to You ” Are Payments to Human Research Subjects Ethically Suspect ? 2019;15(6).
5. Protection of human subjects. Belmont Report: notice of report for public comment. Fed Regist. 1979 Apr;44(76):23191–7.
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Evaluating the role that Care Groups play in providing breastfeeding and infant feeding support at community level: a qualitative study in Dedza district in Malawi;HRB Open Research;2024-06-12
2. III. SPECIAL ISSUES IN MINORITY PARTICIPATION IN HEALTH RESEARCH;Race and Research: Perspectives on Minority Participation in Health Studies, 2nd ed.;2024-01
3. II. ETHICAL, SOCIAL, AND BEHAVIORAL PERSPECTIVES;Race and Research: Perspectives on Minority Participation in Health Studies, 2nd ed.;2024-01
4. I. THE MEANING OF RACE IN HEALTH RESEARCH;Race and Research: Perspectives on Minority Participation in Health Studies, 2nd ed.;2024-01
5. Index;Race and Research: Perspectives on Minority Participation in Health Studies, 2nd ed.;2024-01