Abstract
AbstractKnowing what the highest-level mammalian carnivores and intermediate levels eat throughout the geography and how human activities may affect their community dynamics is relevant information to focusing and deciding on conservation efforts within a territory. In this review, we characterize geographically the accumulated knowledge about the trophic niche of terrestrial mammalian carnivore species and evaluate the spatial relationship between the species richness distribution and the geographical distribution of their trophic knowledge in Chile. We found 88 peer-reviewed papers that include trophic studies per se, theses, and short notes carried out in Chile, where at least one trophic element was reported for terrestrial mammalian carnivore species. We found a positive relationship between the species richness distribution pattern and the spatial distribution of accumulated trophic knowledge, i.e., most of the papers have been conducted in Central-southern Chile (Central Chile and Temperate Forest ecoregions) responding to the highest co-occurrence of carnivore species within the limits of the biodiversity hotspot, the most threatened area in the country. Despite this general relationship, we recognize gaps in knowledge regarding regions of the country that require more research effort, such as O’Higgins, Maule, and Ñuble regions, as well as focus efforts on certain species with no or almost no knowledge of their trophic ecology, such as Leopardus colocola, Lyncodon patagonicus and Conepatus chinga. Except for the northern Chilean ecosystems, there is a generalized report of high consumption of exotic mammals in the diet of carnivores in the center and south of the country. However, of the 98 localities recognized in the 88 papers, 20.4% correspond to an anthropized environment, while most (79.6%) correspond to a “non-anthropized” environment or protected area. We hope this review allows researchers and decision-makers to consider the knowledge and lack thereof of carnivore trophic interactions as an opportunity to conserve entire natural communities throughout the Chilean territory.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference166 articles.
1. Altamirano TA, Hernández F, De La Maza M, Bonacic C. Güiña (Leopardus guigna) preys on cavity-nesting nestlings. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural. 2013;86(4):501–4.
2. Arroyo MT, Marquet P, Marticorena C, Simonetti J, Cavieres L, Squeo F, Rozzi R, Massardo F. El hotspot chileno, prioridad mundial para la conservación. In: Ocho Libros Editores. Biodiversidad de Chile, patrimonio y desafíos. Santiago, Chile; 2008. 90–93 pp.
3. Atalah AG, Sielfeld W, Venegas C. Antecedentes sobre el nicho trófico de Canis griseus Gray 1836, en Tierra del Fuego. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia (Punta Arenas, Chile). 1980;11:259–71.
4. Bank MS, Sarno RJ, Campbell NK, Franklin WL. Predation of guanacos (Lama guanicoe) by southernmost mountain lions (Puma concolor) during a historically severe winter in Torres del Paine National Park. Chile Journal of Zoology. 2002;258(2):215–22.
5. Banks PB, Nordström M, Ahola M, Salo P, Fey K, Korpimäki E. Impacts of alien mink predation on island vertebrate communities of the Baltic Sea Archipelago: review of a long-term experimental study. Boreal Environ Res. 2008;13:3.