Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the impact of a high efficiency rapid standardized OR (RAPSTOR) for hemithyroid/parathyroid surgery using standardized equipment sets (SES) and consecutive case scheduling (CCS) on turnover times (TOT), average case volumes, patient outcomes, hospital costs and OR efficiency/stress.
Methods
Patients requiring hemithyroidectomy (primary or completion) or unilateral parathyroidectomy in a single surgeon’s practice were scheduled consecutively with SES. Retrospective control groups were classified as sequential (CS) or non-sequential (CNS). A survey regarding OR efficiency/stress was administered. Phenomenography and descriptive statistics were conducted for time points, cost and patient outcome variables. Hospital cost minimization analysis was performed.
Results
The mean TOT of RAPSTOR procedures (16 min; n = 27) was not significantly different than CS (14 min, n = 14) or CNS (17 min, n = 6). Mean case number per hour was significantly increased in RAPSTOR (1.2) compared to both CS (0.9; p < 0.05) and CNS (0.7; p < 0.05). Average operative time was significantly reduced in RAPSTOR (32 min; n = 28) compared to CNS (48 min; p < 0.05) but not CS (33 min; p = 0.06). Time to discharge was reduced in RAPSTOR (595 min) compared to CNS (1210 min, p < 0.05). There was no difference in complication rate between all groups (p = 0.27). Survey responses suggested improved efficiency, teamwork and workflow. Furthermore, there is associated decrease in direct operative costs for RAPSTOR vs. CS.
Conclusion
A high efficiency standardized OR for hemithyroid and parathyroid surgery using SES and CCS is associated with improved efficiency and, in this study, led to increased capacity at reduced cost without compromising patient safety.
Level of evidence
Level 2.
Graphical abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery
Reference16 articles.
1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. National Health Expenditure Trends, 1975 to 2016. Ottawa: CIHI; 2016.
2. Mason S, Nicolay C, Darzi A. The use of Lean and six sigma methodologies I surgery: a systematic review. J Roy Coll Surg Edin. 2013;13(2):1–10.
3. Cima R, Brown MJ, Hebl J, Moore R, Rogers JC, Kollengode A, et al. Use of Lean and six sigma methodology to improve operating room efficience in a high-volume tertiary-care academic medical center. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(1):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.009.
4. Avansino J, Goldin A, Risley R, Waldhausen J, Sawin R. Standardization of operative equipment reduces cost. J Ped Surg. 2013;48(9):1843–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.11.045.
5. Chin C, Sowerby L, John-Baptiste A, Rotenberg B. Reducing otolaryngology surgical inefficiency via assessment of tray redundancy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;3(43):43–6.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献