Author:
Crealey Gráinne E.,Hickey Gráinne,McGilloway Sinead
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study assessed whether a relatively newly developed Parent and Infant (PIN) parenting support programme was cost-effective when compared to services as usual (SAU).
Methods
The cost-effectiveness of the PIN programme versus SAU was assessed from an Irish health and social care perspective over a 24-month timeframe and within the context of a non-randomised, controlled before-and-after trial. In total, 163 parent-infant dyads were included in the study (86 intervention, 77 control). The primary outcome measure for the economic evaluation was the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC).
Results
The average cost of the PIN programme was €647 per dyad. The mean (SE) cost (including programme costs) was €7,027 (SE €1,345) compared to €4,811 (SE €593) in the control arm, generating a (non-significant) mean cost difference of €2,216 (bootstrap 95% CI -€665 to €5,096; p = 0.14). The mean incremental cost-effectiveness of the PIN service was €614 per PSOC unit gained (bootstrap 95% CI €54 to €1,481). The probability that the PIN programme was cost-effective, was 87% at a willingness-to-pay of €1,000 per one unit change in the PSOC.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the PIN programme was cost-effective at a relatively low willingness-to-pay threshold when compared to SAU. This study addresses a significant knowledge gap in the field of early intervention by providing important real world evidence on the implementation costs and cost-effectiveness of a universal early years parenting programme. The challenges involved in assessing the cost-effectiveness of preventative interventions for very young children and their parents are also discussed.
Trial registration
ISRCTN17488830 (Date of registration: 27/11/15). This trial was retrospectively registered.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Belsky J, Beaver KM. Cumulative-genetic plasticity, parenting and adolescent self-regulation. JCCP. 2011;52:619–26.
2. Banella FE, Tronick E. Mutual regulation and unique forms of implicit relational knowing. In: Apter, G., Devouche, E., Gratier, M. (eds) Early Interaction and Developmental Psychopathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04769-6_3.
3. Peckins MK, Roberts AG, Hein TC, Hyde LW, Mitchell C, Brooks-Gunn J, Lopez-Duran NL. Violence exposure and social deprivation is associated with cortisol reactivity in urban adolescents. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020;111:104426.
4. Hein TC, Monk CS. Research Review: Neural response to threat in children, adolescents, and adults after child maltreatment–a quantitative meta-analysis. JCPP. 2017;58:222–30.
5. Kaul D, Schwab SG, Mechawar N, Matosin N. How stress physically re-shapes the brain: Impact on brain cell shapes, numbers and connections in psychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;124:193–215.