Author:
Vsevolozhskaya Olga A.,Manz Karina C.,Zephyr Pierre M.,Waters Teresa M.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Since October 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has penalized 25% of U.S. hospitals with the highest rates of hospital-acquired conditions under the Hospital Acquired Conditions Reduction Program (HACRP). While early evaluations of the HACRP program reported cumulative reductions in hospital-acquired conditions, more recent studies have not found a clear association between receipt of the HACRP penalty and hospital quality of care. We posit that some of this disconnect may be driven by frequent scoring updates. The sensitivity of the HACRP penalties to updates in the program’s scoring methodology has not been independently evaluated.
Methods
We used hospital discharge records from 14 states to evaluate the association between changes in HACRP scoring methodology and corresponding shifts in penalty status. To isolate the impact of changes in scoring methods over time, we used FY2018 hospital performance data to calculate total HAC scores using FY2015 through FY2018 CMS scoring methodologies.
Results
Comparing hospital penalty status based on various HACRP scoring methodologies over time, we found a significant overlap between penalized hospitals when using FY 2015 and 2016 scoring methodologies (95%) and between FY 2017 and 2018 methodologies (46%), but substantial differences across early vs later years. Only 15% of hospitals were eligible for penalties across all four years. We also found significant changes in a hospital’s (relative) ranking across the various years, indicating that shifts in penalty status were not driven by small changes in HAC scores clustered around the penalty threshold.
Conclusions
HACRP penalties have been highly sensitive to program updates, which are generally announced after performance periods are concluded. This disconnect between performance and penalties calls into question the ability of the HACRP to improve patient safety as intended.
Funder
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference25 articles.
1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Scorecard on Rates of Hospital-Acquired Conditions 2010 to 2015: Interim Data From National Efforts To Make Health Care Safer. 2016. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/pfp/2015-interim.html. Accessed 9 Sep 2020.
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ National Scorecard on Hospital-Acquired Conditions Updated Baseline Rates and Preliminary Results 2014–2017. 2019. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/pfp/index.html. Accessed 9 Sep 2020.
3. Sheetz KH, Dimick JB, Englesbe MJ, Ryan AM. Hospital-acquired condition reduction program is not associated with additional patient safety improvement. Health Aff. 2019; 38(11):1858–65.
4. Morgan DM, Kamdar N, Regenbogen SE, Krapohl G, Swenson C, Pearlman M, Campbell Jr DA, Hendren S. Evaluation of the methods used by medicare’s hospital-acquired condition reduction program to identify outlier hospitals for surgical site infection. J Am Coll Surg. 2018; 227(3):346–56.
5. Sankaran R, Sukul D, Nuliyalu U, Gulseren B, Engler TA, Arntson E, Zlotnick H, Dimick JB, Ryan AM. Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the us hospital acquired condition reduction program: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2019; 366:4109.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献