Author:
Anttila Minna,Koivisto Juha,Luoma Minna-Liisa,Anttila Heidi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is a need for better adoption of technology to meet the needs of home care professionals, older people, and informal caregivers.
Methods
Mixed methods were used to describe and analyse quantitative and qualitative data in a Finnish governmental programme called KATI. The study was three-fold: it 1) listed what kinds of technologies were piloted and deployed in a national study, 2) provided information from the perspectives of home care professionals about requirements to use technology by using focus-group interviews, and 3) assessed experiences of how the adoption of technology changes work and work processes over time by using repeated surveys. Informants in interviews (n = 25) and surveys (n = 90) were home care professionals, who also described the perspectives of older people and informal caregivers. The conceptual models framing the study were adapted from the Technology Acceptance Model and DirVA PROVE-IT.
Results
There were 80 technology pilots, in which variety of technologies were followed in home care. Familiarity with, commitment to and understanding of technology benefits were considered to be requirements for the technology to be used. The adoption of technology provided new skills and information about older people’s wellbeing, realisation of treatment and new possibilities in home care. It developed new procedures to focus on older people’s needs and motivated professionals by gained concrete aid. It enabled them to leave out some concrete procedures as unnecessary. On the other hand, there were also pessimistic and negative experiences when technology use provided nothing new or did not change anything.
Conclusions
The adoption of technology is dependent on the technology and its integration into the prevailing service practice. When they both work, it is possible to leave out unnecessary procedures in care, allocate resources and save time. It is possible to be aware of older people’s safety and how they cope at home, find new ways to get involved in older people’s lives, gain insight, and make changes at work. Continuous on-site training, modifications in service practices and communication throughout organisations is needed.
Funder
The Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Economic Surveys: Finland 2020. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-economic-surveys-finland_19990545. Accessed 25 May 2023.
2. World Health Organization (WHO) Ageing and health. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Accessed 25 May 2023.
3. Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Use of information and communications technology by individuals [e-publication]. ISSN=2341–8710. 2020. Helsinki: Statistics Finland [referred: 6.3.2023]. Access method: http://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/2020/sutivi_2020_2020-11-10_tie_001_en.html.
4. Pew Research Center 2023. Older Adults & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/01/13/share-of-those-65-and-older-who-are-tech-users-has-grown-in-the-past-decade/. Accessed 25 May 2023.
5. Lindeman DA, Kim KK, Gladstone C, Apesoa-Varano EC. Technology and caregiving: emerging interventions and directions for research. Gerontologist. 2020;60(Suppl 1):41–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz178.