Strategies for spinal surgery reimbursement: bundling in the working-age population

Author:

Dalton Michael K.ORCID,Mjåset Christer,Manful Adoma,Helgeson Melvin D.,Wynn-Jones William,Cooper Zara,Koehlmoos Tracey P.,Weissman Joel S.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Bundled payments for spine surgery, which is known for having high overall cost with wide variation, have been previously studied in older adults. However, there has been limited work examining bundled payments in working-age patients. We sought to identify the variation in the cost of spine surgery among working age adults in a large, national insurance claims database. Methods We queried the TRICARE claims database for all patients, aged 18–64, undergoing cervical and non-cervical spinal fusion surgery between 2012 and 2014. We calculated the case mix adjusted, price standardized payments for all aspects of care during the 60-, 90-, and 180-day periods post operation. Variation was assessed by stratifying Hospital Referral Regions into quintiles. Results After adjusting for case mix, there was significant variation in the cost of both cervical ($10,538.23, 60% of first quintile) and non-cervical ($20,155.59, 74%). Relative variation in total cost decreased from 60- to 180-days (63 to 55% and 76 to 69%). Index hospitalization was the primary driver of costs and variation for both cervical (1st-to-5th quintile range: $11,033–$19,960) and non-cervical ($18,565–$36,844) followed by readmissions for cervical ($0–$11,521) and non-cervical ($0–$13,932). Even at the highest quintile, post-acute care remained the lowest contribution to overall cost ($2070 & $2984). Conclusions There is wide variation in the cost of spine surgery across the United States for working age adults, driven largely by index procedure and readmissions costs. Our findings suggest that implementing episodes longer than the current 90-day standard would do little to better control cost variation.

Funder

Defense Health Agency

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference38 articles.

1. Fisher ES, Bynum JP, Skinner JS. Slowing the growth of health care costs - lessons from regional variation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:849–52.

2. Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. J Am Med Assoc. 2012;307:1513–6.

3. Porter ME. A strategy for health care reform — toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:109–12. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0904131.

4. Porter ME, Kaplan RS. How to pay for health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2016;1:88–100 https://hbr.org/2016/07/how-to-pay-for-health-care. Accessed 3 Mar 2020.

5. CMS Innovation Center. Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative: General Information. https://innovation.cms.gov/innovation-models/bundled-payments. Accessed 1 Apr 2020.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3