Author:
Klavina Aija,Ng Kwok,Lazarieva Olena,Mruga Marina,Tymruk-Skoropad Kateryna,Rokutov Serhii,Bazylchuk Oleh,Zakaliak Nataliia,Billiet Lorenzo,Tsizh Lubov,Popovych Dariya,Myndziv Kateryna,Yezhova Olha
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Biopsychosocial (BPS) model is recognized and widely accepted in the field of health care, particularly in rehabilitation. However, in clinical practice the applicability of the BPS model is a challenge for many professionals.
Method
This study aimed to explore the factors that impact the perception of rehabilitation professionals about the BPS model in Ukraine. In addition, the job satisfaction assessment was done to measure whether rehabilitation specialists in Ukraine fulfil their professional roles according to their expectations and values. Participants were 346 rehabilitation specialists from Ukraine who completed the Bio-Psycho-Social Scale (BPS) for Use in Healthcare and the Global Job Satisfaction Scale (GJSS). The ANOVA was used to investigate the outcome differences between the two scales.
Results
The highest proportion of responders in this study represented state health services. The BPS subscale outcomes on “assessment and reporting” and “professional knowledge and skills” were significantly higher for specialists from a private sector. The global job satisfaction scale outcomes did not differ between responders from the private and state health sector. The perception of professionals networks was associated with greater job satisfaction.
Conclusions
The findings suggest that conception of the BPS approach in rehabilitation system of Ukraine varies across the private and state settings. The professional network plays important role in job satisfaction of rehabilitation professionals in Ukraine. Future research focusing on education strategies to effectively train professionals to apply biopsychosocial approach to practice is of critical importance to prepare rehabilitation specialists in Ukraine.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. International classification of functioning disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disabilityand-health . Available online
2. Miles A, Mezzich J. The care of the patient and the soul of the clinic: person- centered medicine as an emergent model of modern clinical practice. I J Person Centered Med. 2011;1(2):207–22.
3. Van de Velde D, Eijkelkamp A, Peersman W, De Vriendt P. How competent are healthcare professionals in working according to a bio-psycho-social model in healthcare? the current status and validation of a scale. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0164018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164018.
4. Alexanders J, Anderson A, Henderson S. Musculoskeletal physiotherapists’ use of psychological interventions: a systematic review of therapists’ perceptions and practice. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(2):95–102.
5. França AA, Santos VD, Filho RL, Pires KF, Lagoa KF, Martins WR. “It’s very complicated”: Perspectives and beliefs of newly graduated physiotherapists about the biopsychosocial model for treating people experiencing non-specific low back pain in Brazil. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019;42:84–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2019.04.011.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献