Author:
Zamorano Paula,Espinoza Manuel Antonio,Varela Teresita,Abbott Tomas,Tellez Alvaro,Armijo Nicolás,Suarez Francisco
Abstract
AbstractMultimorbidity and patient-centered care approaches are growing challenges for health systems and patients. The cost of multimorbidity patients and the transition to a new care strategy is still sightly explored. In Chile, more than 70% of the adult population suffer from multimorbidity, opening an opportunity to implement a Multimorbidity patient-centered care model. The objective of this study was to perform an economic evaluation of the model from the public health system perspective.The methodology used a cost-consequence evaluation comparing seven exposed with seven unexposed primary care centers, and their reference hospitals. It followed three steps. First, we performed a Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing with routinely collected data routinely collected. Second, we run a comparative analysis through a propensity score matching and an estimation of the attributable costs to health services utilization at primary, secondary and tertiary care and health outcomes. Third, we estimated implementation and transaction costs.Results showed savings in aggregate costs of the total population (-0.12 (0.03) p < 0.01) during the period under evaluation. Costs in primary care showed a significant increase, whereas tertiary care showed significant savings. Health outcomes were associated with higher survival in patients under the new care model (HR 0.70 (0.05) p < 0.01). Implementation and transaction costs increased as the number of pilot intervention centers increased, and they represented 0,07% of the total annual budget of the Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Sur Oriente. After three years of piloting, the implementation and transaction cost for the total period was USD 1,838,767 and 393,775, respectively.The study’s findings confirm the purpose of the new model to place primary health care at the center of care for people with non-communicable chronic diseases. Thus, it is necessary to consider implementation and transaction costs to introduce a broad health system multimorbidity approach. The health system should assume some of them permanently to guarantee sustainability and facilitate scale-up.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Gauld R, Blank R, Burgers J, Cohen AB, Dobrow MK, Ikegami NKI, et al. The World Health report 2008 - primary healthcare: how wide is the gap between its agenda and implementation in 12 high-income health systems? Healthc Policy. 2012;7(3):38–58.
2. Skou ST, Mair FS, Fortin M, Guthrie B, Nunes BP, Miranda JJ et al. Multimorbidity Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2022;8(1).
3. Huaquiá-Diáz AM, Chalán-Dávila TS, Carrillo-Larco RM, Bernabe-Ortiz A. Multimorbidity in Latin America and the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):1–8.
4. Onder G, Palmer K, Navickas R, Jurevičiene E, Mammarella F, Strandzheva M, et al. Time to face the challenge of multimorbidity. A european perspective from the joint action on chronic diseases and promoting healthy ageing across the life cycle (JA-CHRODIS). Eur J Intern Med. 2015;26(3):157–9.
5. Willadsen TG, Bebe A, Køster-Rasmussen R, Jarbøl DE, Guassora AD, Waldorff FB, et al. The role of diseases, risk factors and symptoms in the definition of multimorbidity – a systematic review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016;34(2):112–21.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献