Measuring rurality in health services research: a scoping review

Author:

Danek Robin,Blackburn Justin,Greene Marion,Mazurenko Olena,Menachemi Nir

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study is a scoping review of the different methods used to measure rurality in the health services research (HSR) literature. Methods We identified peer-reviewed empirical studies from 2010–2020 from seven leading HSR journals, including the Journal of Rural Health, that used any definition to measure rurality as a part of their analysis. From each study, we identified the geographic unit (e.g., county, zip code) and definition (e.g., Rural Urban Continuum Codes, Rural Urban Commuting Areas) used to classify categories of rurality. We analyzed whether geographic units and definitions used to classify rurality differed by focus area of studies, including costs, quality, and access to care. Lastly, we examined the number of rural categories used by authors to assess rural areas. Findings In 103 included studies, five different geographic units and 11 definitions were used to measure rurality. The most common geographic units used to measure rurality were county (n = 59, 57%), which was used most frequently in studies examining cost (n = 12, 75%) and access (n = 33, 57.9%). Rural Urban Commuting Area codes were the most common definition used to measure rurality for studies examining access (n = 13, 22.8%) and quality (n = 10, 44%). The majority of included studies made rural versus urban comparisons (n = 82, 80%) as opposed to focusing on rural populations only (n = 21, 20%). Among studies that compared rural and urban populations, most studies used only one category to identify rural locations (n = 49 of 82 studies, 60%). Conclusion Geographic units and definitions to determine rurality were used inconsistently within and across studies with an HSR focus. This finding may affect how health disparities by rural location are determined and thus how resources and federal funds are allocated. Future research should focus on developing a standardized system to determine under what circumstances researchers should use different geographic units and methods to determine rurality by HSR focus area.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference38 articles.

1. Ratcliffe M, Fields A, Holder K, Burd C. Defining rural at the U.S. Census Bureau [Internet]. Census.gov. US Census Bureau; 2016. Available from: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2016/acs/acsgeo-1.html

2. Smith A, Trevelyan E. Understanding and using the American Community Survey. [Internet]. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2019/acs/acs-41.pdf. 2019. Available from: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2021/acs/acs_pums_handbook_2021.pdf

3. Reichert C, Greiman L, Myers A. The Geography of Disability in America: On rural-urban differences in impairment rates [Internet]. ScholarWorks at University of Montana. University of Montana; 2016. Available from: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/ruralinst_independent_living_community_participation/7/.

4. McCarthy JF, Blow FC, Ignacio RV, Ilgen MA, Austin KL, Valenstein M. Suicide among patients in the Veterans Affairs health system: rural-urban differences in rates, risks, and methods. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(Suppl 1):S111-7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300463 (Epub 2012 Jan 25. PMID: 22390583; PMCID: PMC3496440).

5. Foutz J, Artiga S, Garfield R. The role of Medicaid in rural America [Internet]. KFF. Kaiser Issue Brief; 2018. Available from: https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/the-role-of-medicaid-in-rural-america

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3