Exploration of how primary care models influence job satisfaction among primary care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Brunswick: a descriptive and comparative study

Author:

Johnson Claire,Bourgoin Dominique,Dupuis Jérémie B.,Félix Jenny Manuèle,LeBlanc Véronique,McLennan Danielle,St-Louis Luveberthe

Abstract

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted human resource gaps and physician shortages in healthcare systems in New Brunswick (NB), as evidenced by multiple healthcare service interruptions. In addition, the New Brunswick Health Council gathered data from citizens on the type of primary care models (i.e. physicians in solo practice, physicians in collaborative practice, and collaborative practice with physicians and nurse practitioners) they use as their usual place of care. To add to their survey’s findings, our study aims to see how these different primary care models were associated with job satisfaction as reported by primary care providers. Methods In total, 120 primary care providers responded to an online survey about their primary care models and job satisfaction levels. We used IBM’s “SPSS Statistics” software to run Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests to compare job satisfaction levels between variable groups to determine if there were statistically significant variations. Results Overall, 77% of participants declared being satisfied at work. The reported job satisfaction levels did not appear to be influenced by the primary care model. Participants reported similar job satisfaction levels regardless of if they practiced alone or in collaboration. Although 50% of primary care providers reported having symptoms of burnout and experienced a decline in job satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic, the primary care model was not associated with these experiences. Therefore, participants who reported burnout or a decline in job satisfaction were similar in all primary care models. Our study’s results suggest that the autonomy to choose a preferred model was important, since 45.8% of participants reported choosing their primary care models, based on preference. Proximity to family and friends and balancing work and family emerged as critical factors that influence choosing a job and staying in that job. Conclusion Primary care providers’ staffing recruitment and retention strategies should include the factors reported as determinants in our study. Primary care models do not appear to influence job satisfaction levels, although having the autonomy to choose a preferred model was reported as highly important. Consequently, it may be counterproductive to impose specific primary care models if one aims to prioritize primary care providers’ job satisfaction and wellness.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference47 articles.

1. Asghari S, Aubrey-Bassler K, Godwin M, Rourke J, Mathews M, Barnes P, et al. Factors influencing choice to Practise in Rural and Remote Communities throughout a physician’s Career cycle. Can J Rural Med. 2017;22(3):92.

2. Fleming P, Sinnot M-L. Rural Physician Supply and Retention: Factors in the Canadian Context. 2018;23(1):7.

3. Radio Canada. Il manque près de 200 médecins et 800 infirmières au Nouveau-Brunswick. 2022.

4. Government of New Brunswick. Striving for Dependable Public Health Care A discussion paper on the future of health care in New Brunswick. Fredericton, New Brunswick. ; 2021. Report No.: Print Bilingual: 978-1-4605-2692-7 PDF English: 978-1-4605-2693-4 PDF French: 978-1-4605-2694-1.

5. Réseau de santé Vitalité. Interruption temporaire des services d’obstétrique à l’Hôpital régional Chaleur Bathurst, Nouveau-Brunswick2018 [Available from: https://www.vitalitenb.ca/fr/nouvelles/interruption-temporaire-des-services-dobstetrique-lhopital-regional-chaleur.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3