Author:
Orlova I.A.,Akopyan Zh.A.,Plisyuk A.G.,Tarasova E.V.,Borisov E.N.,Dolgushin G.O.,Khvatova E.I.,Grigoryan M.A.,Gabbasova L.A.,Kamalov A.A.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To date, no opinion surveys has been conducted among Russian physicians to study their awareness about artificial intelligence. With a survey, we aimed to evaluate the attitudes of stakeholders to the usage of technologies employing AI in the field of medicine and healthcare and identify challenges and perspectives to introducing AI.
Methods
We conducted a 12-question online survey using Google Forms. The survey consisted of questions related to the recognition of AI and attitudes towards it, the direction of development of AI in medicine and the possible risks of using AI in medicine.
Results
301 doctors took part in the survey. 107 (35.6%) responded that they are familiar with AI. The vast majority of participants considered AI useful in the medical field (85%). The advantage of AI was associated with the ability to analyze huge volumes of clinically relevant data in real time (79%). Respondents highlighted areas where AI would be most useful—organizational optimization (74%), biopharmaceutical research (67%), and disease diagnosis (52%). Among the possible problems when using AI, they noted the lack of flexibility and limited application on controversial issues (64% and 60% of respondents). 56% believe that AI decision making will be difficult if inadequate information is presented for analysis. A third of doctors fear that specialists with little experience took part in the development of AI, and 89% of respondents believe that doctors should participate in the development of AI for medicine and healthcare. Only 20 participants (6.6%) responded that they agree that AI can replace them at work. At the same time, 76% of respondents believe that in the future, doctors using AI will replace those who do not.
Conclusions
Russian doctors are for AI in medicine. Most of the respondents believe that AI will not replace them in the future and will become a useful tool. First of all, for optimizing organizational processes, research and diagnostics of diseases.
Trial registration
This study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the Lomonosov Moscow State University Medical Research and Education Center (IRB00010587).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Hastie TT, Friedman J, Tibshirani R. The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2009.
2. Abu-Mostafa Y, Magdon-Ismail M, Lin HT. Learning from Data. Learning From Data: New York: AMLbook.com, 2012. р. 201. ISBN 978-1-600-49006-4.
3. Kononenko I. Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artif Intell Med. 2001;23(1):89–109.
4. Pyo S, Lee J, Cha M, Jang H. Predictability of machine learning techniques to forecast the trends of market index prices: hypothesis testing for the Korean stock markets. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188107.
5. Miller DD, Brown EW. Artificial intelligence in medical practice: the question to the answer? Am J Med. 2018;131(2):129–33.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献