Characteristics and risk factors of pharmacist misconduct in New Zealand: a retrospective nationwide analysis

Author:

Wang Yufeng,Ram Sanyogita,Scahill Shane

Abstract

Abstract Background Professional misconduct has evolved into a worldwide concern, involving various forms and types of behaviours that contribute to unsafe practices. This study aimed to provide insights into the patterns characterising pharmacist misconduct and uncover underlying factors contributing to such instances in New Zealand. Methods This research examined all cases of pharmacist misconduct sourced from the Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal (HPDT) database in New Zealand since 2004. Characteristics of the sampled pharmacists and cases were extracted, followed by a systematic coding of the observed misconduct issues. Identification of risk factors was accomplished through content analysis techniques, enabling an assessment of their prevalence across various forms of misconduct. Results The dataset of pharmacist misconduct cases comprised 58 disciplinary records involving 55 pharmacists. Seven types of misconduct were identified, with the most commonly observed being quality and safety issues related to drug, medication and care, as well as criminal conviction. A total of 13 risk factors were identified and systematically classified into three categories: (1) social, regulatory, and external environmental factors, (2) systematic, organisational, and practical considerations in the pharmacy, and (3) pharmacist individual factors. The most frequently mentioned and far-reaching factors include busyness, heavy workload or distraction; health impairment issues; and life stress or challenges. Conclusions The patterns of pharmacist misconduct are complicated, multifaceted, and involve complex interactions among risk factors. Collaborative efforts involving individual pharmacists, professional bodies, responsible authorities, policy-makers, health funders and planners in key areas such as pharmacist workload and well-being are expected to mitigate the occurrence of misconduct. Future research should seek to uncover the origins, manifestations, and underlying relationships of various contributing factors through empirical research with appropriate individuals.

Funder

China Scholarship Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference41 articles.

1. Searle RH, Rice C. Making an impact in healthcare contexts: insights from a mixed-methods study of professional misconduct. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2021;30:470–81.

2. Francis R. Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public inquiry: executive summary [online]. 2013. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7ba0faed915d13110607c8/0947.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2023.

3. NHS Resolution. NHS Resolution - Annual report and accounts 2022/23 [online]. 2023. https://resolution.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/4405-NHSR-Annual-Report-and-Accounts_Rollout_A_Access2.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2023.

4. Sklar T, Taouk Y, Studdert D, Spittal M, Paterson R, Bismark M. Characteristics of lawyers who are subject to complaints and Misconduct findings. J Empir Leg Stud. 2019;16:318–42.

5. Spittal MJ, Bismark MM, Studdert DM. The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24:360–8.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3