Supporting medicines management for older people at care transitions – a theory-based analysis of a systematic review of 24 interventions

Author:

Tomlinson JustineORCID,Marques IuriORCID,Silcock JonathanORCID,Fylan BethORCID,Dyson JudithORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Older patients are at severe risk of harm from medicines following a hospital to home transition. Interventions aiming to support successful care transitions by improving medicines management have been implemented. This study aimed to explore which behavioural constructs have previously been targeted by interventions, which individual behaviour change techniques have been included, and which are yet to be trialled. Method This study mapped the behaviour change techniques used in 24 randomised controlled trials to the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy. Once elicited, techniques were further mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore which determinants of behaviour change had been targeted, and what gaps, if any existed. Results Common behaviour change techniques used were: goals and planning; feedback and monitoring; social support; instruction on behaviour performance; and prompts/cues. These may be valuable when combined in a complex intervention. Interventions mostly mapped to between eight and 10 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. Environmental context and resources was an underrepresented domain, which should be considered within future interventions. Conclusion This study has identified behaviour change techniques that could be valuable when combined within a complex intervention aiming to support post-discharge medicines management for older people. Whilst many interventions mapped to eight or more determinants of behaviour change, as identified within the Theoretical Domains Framework, careful assessment of the barriers to behaviour change should be conducted prior to intervention design to ensure all appropriate domains are targeted.

Funder

Research for Patient Benefit Programme

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference70 articles.

1. Aitken M, Gorokhovich L. Advancing the responsible use of medicines: applying levers for change: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; 2012. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2222541

2. World Health Organisation. WHO Global Patient Safety Challenge: Medication Without Harm. 2017; Available from: https://www.who.int/patientsafety/medication-safety/medication-without-harm-brochure/en/.

3. Elliott R, Camacho E, Jankovic D, Sculpher MJ, Faria R. Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;0(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010206.

4. World Health Organisation. Strategic Framework of the Global Patient Safety Challenge. 2018; Available from: https://www.who.int/patientsafety/medication-safety/strategic-framework.pdf?ua=1

5. Sheikh A, Rudan I, Cresswell K, Dhingra-Kumar N, Tan ML, Häkkinen ML, et al. Agreeing on global research priorities for medication safety: an international prioritization exercise. J Glob Health. 2019;9(1). https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.010422.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3