Author:
Pinto Rogério M.,Hall Evan,Im Vitalis,Lee Carol A.,Park Sunggeun
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The United States envisions a 90% reduction in HIV infections by 2030. However, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the HIV continuum and disproportionately affected access to social and health services for people at the highest vulnerability. This study shows how stakeholders in the State of Michigan handled disruptions and their key recommendations. As a case study, this study adds to the literature about preparedness for future pandemics.
Methods
We interviewed 33 statewide Michigan HIV/AIDS Council members—practitioners, researchers, and community representatives, guiding service planning, improvement, and resource allocations, measuring group cohesiveness using a tested scale. We measured group cohesiveness as a proxy for how individual opinions reflected those of the Council as a group. We used qualitative questions to assess: (1) how the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted HIV prevention; (2) how disruptions were handled; and (3) recommendation to help address disruptions now and in the future. Using thematic analysis, we coded the interviews.
Results
We found a high degree of cohesiveness. Participants agreed that the pandemic disrupted HIV prevention services (e.g., HIV testing, PrEP education, referrals to primary care, etcetera) offered by community organizations, hospital clinics, and health departments across the state. In response, they developed online and curbside services to maintain HIV services, abate social isolation, and address structural issues like lack of food and public transportation. We organized results in four categories: (1) HIV service disruptions (e.g., “Housing for women and children who are fleeing a legal situation”); (2) Responses to disruptions (e.g., “Some of them, we would say, hey, weather permitting, we’ll come out to your car”); (3) Minoritized groups disproportionately affected (e.g., “Especially in my community, to get people if there’s ever a vaccine, Black people are going to be the last people to take it”); and (4) Recommendations (below).
Conclusions
The pandemic unsettled and further exacerbated every aspect of HIV service provision. The main recommendation was to overhaul communication systems between government and organizations offering HIV services to mitigate disruptions and improve the chances of achieving a 90% reduction.
Funder
National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Fauci AS, Redfield RR, Sigounas G, Weahkee MD, Giroir BP. Ending the HIV Epidemic. JAMA. 2019;321(9):844. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2019.1343.
2. Zhang SX, Wang Y, Rauch A, Wei F. Unprecedented disruption of lives and work: Health, distress and life satisfaction of working adults in China one month into the COVID-19 outbreak. Psychiatry Res. 2020;288:112958. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165178120306521.
3. Bouey JZH, Han J, Liu Y, Vuckovic M, Zhu K, Zhou K et al. A case study of HIV / AIDS services from community-based organizations during COVID-19 lockdown in China. 2023;1–11.
4. Pirtle W, Wright T. Structural gendered racism revealed in pandemic times: Intersectional approaches to understanding race and gender health inequities in COVID-19. Gend Soc. 2021;35(2):168–79.
5. Simmons A, Chappel A, Kolbe AR, Bush L, Sommers BD. Health disparities by Race and Ethnicity during the COVID-19 pandemic: current evidence and policy approaches. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.; 2021.