Theoretical and methodological considerations in evaluating large-scale health information technology change programmes

Author:

Cresswell KathrinORCID,Sheikh Aziz,Franklin Bryony Dean,Krasuska Marta,Nguyen Hung The,Hinder Susan,Lane Wendy,Mozaffar Hajar,Mason Kathy,Eason Sally,Potts Henry W. W.,Williams Robin

Abstract

Abstract Background Attempts to achieve digital transformation across the health service have stimulated increasingly large-scale and more complex change programmes. These encompass a growing range of functions in multiple locations across the system and may take place over extended timeframes. This calls for new approaches to evaluate these programmes. Main body Drawing on over a decade of conducting formative and summative evaluations of health information technologies, we here build on previous work detailing evaluation challenges and ways to tackle these. Important considerations include changing organisational, economic, political, vendor and markets necessitating tracing of evolving networks, relationships, and processes; exploring mechanisms of spread; and studying selected settings in depth to understand local tensions and priorities. Conclusions Decision-makers need to recognise that formative evaluations, if built on solid theoretical and methodological foundations, can help to mitigate risks and help to ensure that programmes have maximum chances of success.

Funder

NHS England

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference39 articles.

1. O’Malley AS. Tapping the unmet potential of health information technology. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(12):1090–1.

2. Greenhalgh T, Stones R. Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(9):1285–94.

3. Coiera E. Building a national health IT system from the middle out. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(3):271–3.

4. Thornton M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010;2010(363):501–4.

5. NHS £4 billion digitisation fund: Industry reaction. Available from: https://www.itproportal.com/2016/02/08/nhs-4-billion-digitisation-fund-industry-reaction/. Accessed 13 Dec 2019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3