Author:
Edelman Alexandra,Allen Tammy,Devine Susan,Horwood Paul F.,McBryde Emma S.,Mudd Julie,Warner Jeffrey,Topp Stephanie M
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The vast region of northern Queensland (NQ) in Australia experiences poorer health outcomes and a disproportionate burden of communicable diseases compared with urban populations in Australia. This study examined the governance of COVID-19 surveillance and response in NQ to identify strengths and opportunities for improvement.
Methods
The manuscript presents an analysis of one case-unit within a broader case study project examining systems for surveillance and response for COVID-19 in NQ. Data were collected between October 2020–December 2021 comprising 47 interviews with clinical and public health staff, document review, and observation in organisational settings. Thematic analysis produced five key themes.
Results
Study findings highlight key strengths of the COVID-19 response, including rapid implementation of response measures, and the relative autonomy of NQ’s Public Health Units to lead logistical decision-making. However, findings also highlight limitations and fragility of the public health system more generally, including unclear accountabilities, constraints on local community engagement, and workforce and other resourcing shortfalls. These were framed by state-wide regulatory and organisational incentives that prioritise clinical health care rather than disease prevention, health protection, and health promotion. Although NQ mobilised an effective COVID-19 response, findings suggest that NQ public health systems are marked by fragility, calling into question the region’s preparedness for future pandemic events and other public health crises.
Conclusions
Study findings highlight an urgent need to improve governance, resourcing, and political priority of public health in NQ to address unmet needs and ongoing threats.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Communicable Disease surveillance and response systems: a guide to planning. Lyon, France: World Health Organization; 2006.
2. Choi BC. The past, present, and future of public health surveillance. Scientifica. 2012;2012:875253.
3. Bell JA, Nuzzo JB. Global Health Security Index: advancing collective action and accountability amid Global Crisis. Washington, DC: Nuclear Threat Initiative; 2021.
4. Bennett S. Responding to the pandemic at a national and state public health level. Microbiol Australia. 2021;42(1):13–7.
5. Van Nguyen H, Lan Nguyen H, Thi Minh Dao A, Van Nguyen T, The Nguyen P, Mai Le P, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: public health responses, opportunities and challenges. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2022;37(1):5–13.