Author:
Le Khanh Hung,La Thi Xuan Phuong,Tykkyläinen Markku
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Effective delivery of health services requires adequate quality in healthcare facilities and easy accessibility to health services physically or virtually. The purpose of this study was to reveal how the quality of healthcare facilities varies across the different parts of Ho Chi Minh City and how well residents (N = 9 million) can reach healthcare facilities. By demarcating the deficiently served areas of low accessibility, the study shows where urban planning and digital healthcare could improve accessibility to health services and the quality of services efficiently.
Methods
The analysis utilised geocoded information on hospitals, clinics, roads and population and the data of the quality scores of healthcare facilities. Quality scores were analysed by hot spot analysis and inverse distance weighting. Accessibility and formation of travel time-based service areas by travel time distances were calculated using road network, driving speed and population data.
Results
The results unveiled a centripetal spatial pattern of healthcare facilities and a similar pattern in their quality. Outside the travel time of 30 min for hospitals and 15 min for clinics, the deficiently served areas have a population of 1.1 to 1.2 million. Based on the results and the evidence of digital healthcare, this paper highlights how to develop and plan spatially effective service provision. Especially, it gives grounds to discuss how cost-effective digital healthcare could be applied to improve the accessibility and quality of health services in an urban structure of extensively varying accessibility to health services.
Conclusions
The results bring up the need and the means for improving the quality of health services and their cost-efficient availability by location optimisation, road improvements and implementing digital healthcare provided by hospitals and clinics in the city. At the same, this study provides a multidisciplinary approach for planning more equal and efficient health service provision geographically.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Kochtitzky CS, Frumkin H, Rodriguez R, Dannenberg AL, Rayman J, Rose K, et al. Urban planning and public Health at CDC. MMWR Suppl. 2006;55 SUP 02:34–8.
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Service availability and readiness assessment (SARA). Version 2.2. 2015. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/149025. Accessed 30 Apr 2022.
3. Scholz S, Ngoli B, Flessa S. Rapid assessment of infrastructure of primary Health care facilities – a relevant instrument for Health care systems management. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:183. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0838-8.
4. Oyekale A. Assessment of primary Health care Facilities’s service readiness in Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2112-8.
5. Vietnam Ministry of Health Portal. Bộ tiêu chí chất lượng bệnh viện Việt Nam, phiên bản 2.0 [Hospital Quality Criteria in Vietnam, version 2.0]. 2016. Available from Cổng thông tin điện tử Bộ Y Tế (MOH), Bản quyền thuộc Bộ Y Tế, Số 138A Giảng Võ - Ba Đình - Hà Nội.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献