A qualitative investigation of uninsured patient and primary care provider perspectives on specialty care eConsults

Author:

Bifulco LaurenORCID,Grzejszczak Lynsey,Velez Idiana,Angelocci Tracy,Anderson DarenORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Uninsured and underinsured patients face specialty care access disparities that prevent them from obtaining the care they need and negatively impact their health and well-being. We aimed to understand how making specialty care electronic consultations (eConsults) available at a multi-site Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in central Texas affected uninsured patients’ care-seeking experiences and impacted their ability to receive the needed care. Methods We used concepts from Ecological Systems Theory to examine individual, interpersonal, organization-level, social, and health policy environment factors that impacted patients’ access to specialty care and the use of eConsults. We conducted thematic analysis of semi-structured, qualitative interviews with patients about seeking specialty care while uninsured and with uninsured patients and FQHC PCPs about their experience using eConsults to obtain specialists’ recommendations. Results Patients and PCPs identified out-of-pocket cost, stigma, a paucity of local specialists willing to see uninsured patients, time and difficulty associated with travel and transportation to specialty visits, and health policy limitations as barriers to obtaining specialty care. Benefits of using eConsults for uninsured patients included minimizing/avoiding financial stress, expanding access to care, expanding scope of primary care, and expediting access to specialists. Concerns about the model included patients’ limited understanding of eConsults, concern about cost, and worry whether eConsults could appropriately meet their specialty needs. Conclusions Findings suggest that eConsults delivered in a primary care FQHC addressed uninsured patients’ specialty care access concerns. They helped to address financial and geographic barriers, provided time and cost savings to patients, expanded FQHC PCPs’ knowledge and care provision options, and allowed patients to receive more care in primary care.

Funder

St David’s Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference50 articles.

1. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x.

2. American Academy of Family Physicians. Primary care. 2023. https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/primary-care.html. Accessed 1 March 2023.

3. Shi L. The impact of primary care: a focused review. Scientifica. 2012;2012. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/432892.

4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Federally Qualified Heath Center. 2022. https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/fqhcfactsheet.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2023.

5. Jiao S, Konetzka RT, Pollack HA, Huang ES. Estimating the impact of Medicaid expansion and federal funding cuts on FQHC staffing and patient capacity. Milbank Q. 2022;100(2):504–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12560.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3