Does assistive technology contribute to safety among home-dwelling older adults?

Author:

Bikova Mariya,Ambugo Eliva Atieno,Tjerbo Trond,Jalovcic Djenana,Førland Oddvar

Abstract

Abstract Background Assistive technology carries the promise of alleviating public expenditure on long-term care, while at the same time enabling older adults to live more safely at home for as long as possible. Home-dwelling older people receiving reablement and dementia care at their homes are two important target groups for assistive technology. However, the need for help, the type of help and the progression of their needs differ. These two groups are seldom compared even though they are two large groups of service users in Norway and their care needs constitute considerable costs to Norwegian municipalities. The study explores how assistive technology impacts the feeling of safety among these two groups and their family caregivers. Methods Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews lasting between 17 and 61 min were conducted between November 2018 and August 2019 with home-dwelling older adults receiving reablement (N = 15) and dementia care (N = 10) and the family caregivers (N = 9) of these users in seven municipalities in Norway. All interviews were audio-recorded, fully transcribed, thematically coded and inductively analyzed following Clarke and Braun’s principles for thematic analysis. Results Service users in both groups felt safe when knowing how to use assistive technology. However, the knowledge of how to use assistive technology was not enough to create a feeling of safety. In fact, for some users, this knowledge was a source of anxiety or frustration, especially when the user had experienced the limitations of the technology. For the service users with dementia, assistive technology was experienced as disturbing when they were unable to understand how to handle it, but at the same time, it also enabled some of them to continue living at home. For reablement users, overreliance on technology could undermine the progress of their functional improvement and thus their independence. Conclusion For users in both service groups, assistive technology may promote a sense of safety but has also disadvantages. However, technology alone does not seem to create a sense of safety. Rather, it is the appropriate use of assistive technology within the context of interactions between service users, their family caregivers and the healthcare staff that contributes to the feeling of safety.

Funder

Western Norway University Of Applied Sciences

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference34 articles.

1. Thomas MJ, Syse A, Gleditsch RF. Nasjonale befolkningsframskrivinger 2020. Modeller, forutsetninger og resultater: Statistisk sentralbyrå/Statistics Norway; 2020. https://ssb.brage.unit.no/ssb-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2659117/RAPP2020-24_web.pdf?sequence=1.

2. Christensen K, Wærness K. Long-term care services in Norway: a historical sociological perspective. United Kingdom: Routledge. 2018;1:15–28.

3. Bikova M, Christensen K. Samproduksjon i mulighetsrommet for brukermedvirkning i norske helse- og omsorgstjenester. Tidsskrift for omsorgsforskning. 2022;8(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.18261/tfo.8.1.9.

4. Ervik R, Lindén TS. The making of ageing policy: theory and practice in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2013.

5. Andrews TM, Tjerbo T, Ambugo EA, Bliksvær T, Fabritius MK, Aguinaldo SJ et al. Årsaker til kostnadsvekst i kommunale pleie-og omsorgstjenester: KS, UiO og Nordlandsforskning; 2021. https://www.ks.no/contentassets/74113e3111a54fdcad825b67f5849cba/Arsaker-til-kostnadsvekst.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3