Author:
McGrail Matthew,Woolley Torres,Pinidiyapathirage Janani,Paton Kath,Smith Deborah,Brumpton Kay,Teague Peta-Ann
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Medical internship is a key transition point in medical training from student to independent (junior) doctor. The national Regional Training Hubs (RTH) policy began across Australia in late 2017, which aims to build medical training pathways for junior doctors within a rural region and guide students, interns and trainees towards these. This study aims to explore preferencing and acceptance trends for rural medical internship positions in Queensland. Moreover, it focuses on internship preference and acceptance outcomes prior to and following the establishment of RTHs, and their association with key covariates such as rural training immersions offered by medical schools.
Methods
Data from all applicants to Queensland Health intern positions between 2014–2021 were available, notably their preference order and location of accepted internship position, classified as rural or metropolitan. Matched data from Queensland’s medical schools were added for rural training time and other key demographics. Analyses explored the statistical associations between these factors and preferencing or accepting rural internships, comparing pre-RTH and post-RTH cohorts.
Results
Domestic Queensland-trained graduates first preferencing rural intern positions increased significantly (pre-RTH 21.1% vs post-RTH 24.0%, p = 0.017), reinforced by a non-significant increase in rural acceptances (27.3% vs 29.7%, p = 0.070). Rural interns were more likely to have previously spent ≥ 11-weeks training in rural locations within medical school, be rurally based in the year applying for internship, or enrolled in the rural generalist pathway.
Conclusions
The introduction of the RTH was associated with a moderate increase of graduates both preferencing and accepting a rural internship, though a richer understanding of the dominant reasons for and against this remain less clear. An expansion of graduates who undertook longer periods of undergraduate rural training in the same period did not diminish the proportion choosing a rural internship, suggesting there remains an appetite for these opportunities. Overall, domestic graduates are identified as a reliable source of intern recruitment and retention to rural hospitals across Queensland, with entry to the rural generalist pathway and extended rural placement experiences enhancing uptake of rural practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Noya F, Carr S, Freeman K, Thompson S, Clifford R, Playford D. Strategies to facilitate improved recruitment, development, and retention of the rural and remote medical workforce: A scoping review. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(10):2022–37.
2. McGrail M, Doyle Z, Fuller L, Sen Gupta T, Shires L, Walters L. The pathway to more rural doctors: the role of universities. Med J Aust. 2023;219(3 Suppl):S8–13.
3. Sturman N, Tan Z, Turner J. “A steep learning curve”: junior doctor perspectives on the transition from medical student to the health-care workplace. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):92.
4. Carlsson Y, Nilsdotter A, Bergman S, Liljedahl M. Junior doctors’ experiences of the medical internship: a qualitative study. Int J Med Educ. 2022;13:66.
5. McGrail M, O’Sullivan BG, Gurney T, Eley D, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S. Exploring doctors’ emerging commitment to rural and general practice roles over their early career. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2021;18:11835.