Author:
Elston Julian,Gradinger Felix P.,Streeter Adam J.,Macey Stephen,Martin Susan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a targeted telephone-based case management service that aimed to reduce ED attendance amongst frequent attenders, known to disproportionately contribute to demand. Evidence on the effectiveness of these services varies.
Methods
A 24-month controlled before-and-after study, following 808 patients (128 cases and 680 controls (41 were non-compliant)) who were offered the service in the first four months of operation within a UK ED department. Patients stratified as high-risk of reattending ED within 6 months by a predictive model were manually screened. Those positively reviewed were offered a non-clinical, nurse-led, telephone-based health coaching, consisting of care planning, coordination and goal setting for up to 9 months. Service effectiveness was estimated using a difference-in-differences (DiD) analysis. Incident rate of ED and Minor Injury Unit (MIU) attendances and average length of stay in intervention recipients and controls over 12 months after receiving their service offer following ED attendance were compared, adjusting for the prior 12-month period, sex and age, to give an incidence rate ratio (IRR).
Results
Intervention recipients were more likely to be female (63.3% versus 55.4%), younger (mean of 69 years versus 76 years), and have higher levels of ED activity (except for MIU) than controls. Mean rates fell between periods for all outcomes (except for MIU attendance). The Intention-to-Treat analysis indicated non-statistically significant effect of the intervention in reducing all outcomes, except for MIU attendances, with IRRs: ED attendances, 0.856 (95% CI: 0.631, 1.160); ED admissions, 0.871 (95% CI: 0.628, 1.208); length of stay for emergency and elective admissions: 0.844 (95% CI: 0.619, 1.151) and 0.781 (95% CI: 0.420, 1.454). MIU attendance increased with an IRR: 2.638 (95% CI: 1.041, 6.680).
Conclusions
Telephone-based health coaching appears to be effective in reducing ED attendances and admissions, with shorter lengths of stay, in intervention recipients over controls. Future studies need to capture outcomes beyond acute activity, and better understand how services like this provide added value.
Funder
South Devon and Torbay Clinical Commissioning Group
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Bobrovitz N, Onakpoya I, Roberts N, et al. Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to reduce unscheduled hospital admissions among adults. BMJ Open. 2015;5(8): e008269. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008269.
2. The Health Foundation. Briefing: Reducing emergency admissions: unlocking the potential of people to better manage their long-term conditions, 2018. Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/Reducing-EmergencyAdmissions-long-term-conditions-briefing.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2022.
3. The Health Foundation. Briefing: Emergency hospital admissions in England: which may be avoidable and how? 2018. Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/Reducing-Emergency-Admissions-long-term-conditions-briefing.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2022.
4. NHS England. A&E Attendances and Emergency Admissions 2017–18. NHS England; 2019. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/ae-waiting-times-and-activity/ae-attendances-andemergency-admissions-2017-18. Accessed 28 July 2022.
5. Kings Fund. The NHS budget and how it has changed. The NHS in a nutshell series; 2020. Available from: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/projects/nhs-in-a-nutshell/nhs-budget. Accessed 28 July 2022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献