Author:
Rabady Susanne,Mayrhofer Mira,Szabo Nathalie,Erber Patrick,Hoffmann Kathryn
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Primary care is internationally recognised as one of the cornerstones of health care. During the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care physicians were assigned a variety of tasks and thus made a significant contribution to a country’s pandemic response. They were expected to perform a variety of tasks, such as diagnosing and treating people with COVID-19, maintaining health care for all other patients, as well as several public health tasks, such as diagnostic testing and vaccination, protecting patients and staff from infection, and serving as community trusted persons. In Austria, there are no structured levels of care, no definition of the role of the general practitioner during a pandemic is given, and no specific support structures are present. The aim of this study was to assess the views and experiences of primary care physicians regarding supportive and hindering factors for pandemic preparedness in Austria.
Methods
Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. A total of 30 general practitioners were interviewed, with particular attention to an equitable distribution in small, medium and large primary care facilities. Qualitative content analysis was performed.
Results
Interviewees described a wide range of infection control, organisational and communication measures that they had implemented. They made changes to practise equipment, found makeshift solutions when supplies were scarce, and established communication and information pathways when official communication lines were inadequate.
Conclusion
General practitioners took on essential tasks and showed a high level of understanding of their role in the pandemic response. This was achieved mainly at an informal level and with high personal commitment. Their functioning in the absence of structural regulations and support shows that they had a clear intrinsic understanding of their responsibilities. To ensure reliability and sustainability and to reduce their burden, it will be necessary to clarify the role and tasks of a general practitioner and to provide the necessary support. This concerns both infrastructural support and communication and information strategies. As part of the reform to strengthen primary care, primary care needs to be seen, valued and involved in decision-making processes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Expert Panel on Effective Ways of Investing in Health. Report on definition of a frame of reference in relation to primary care with a special emphasis on financing systems and referral systems. Brussels: European Commission; 2014. Report No.: V2.
2. Kringos D, Boerma W, Bourgueil Y, Cartier T, Dedeu T, Hasvold T, et al. The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study. Br J Gen Practice: J Royal Coll Gen Practitioners. 2013;63(616):e742–50.
3. Kringos DS, Boerma W, van der Zee J, Groenewegen P. Europe’s strong primary care systems are linked to better population health but also to higher health spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(4):686–94.
4. Organization WH. The World Health Report: primary Health Care—now more than ever. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
5. COVID-19-Pandemie. Bestandsaufnahme, Handlungsrahmen. Vienna: Bundesministerium Soziales, Gesundheit, Pflege und Konsumentenschutz; 2021.