Author:
Romøren Maria,Hermansen Karin Berg,Sævareid Trygve Johannes Lereim,Brøderud Linn,Westbye Siri Færden,Wahl Astrid Klopstad,Thoresen Lisbeth,Rostoft Siri,Førde Reidun,Ahmed Marc,Aas Eline,Midtbust May Helen,Pedersen Reidar
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Acutely ill and frail older adults and their next of kin are often poorly involved in treatment and care decisions. This may lead to either over- or undertreatment and unnecessary burdens. The aim of this project is to improve user involvement and health services for frail older adults living at home, and their relatives, by implementing advance care planning (ACP) in selected hospital wards, and to evaluate the clinical and the implementation interventions.
Methods
This is a cluster randomized trial with 12 hospital units. The intervention arm receives implementation support for 18 months; control units receive the same support afterwards. The ACP intervention consists of 1. Clinical intervention: ACP; 2. Implementation interventions: Implementation team, ACP coordinator, network meetings, training and supervision for health care personnel, documentation tools and other resources, and fidelity measurements with tailored feedback; 3. Implementation strategies: leadership commitment, whole ward approach and responsive evaluation. Fidelity will be measured three times in the intervention arm and twice in the control arm. Here, the primary outcome is the difference in fidelity changes between the arms. We will also include 420 geriatric patients with one close relative and an attending clinician in a triadic sub-study. Here, the primary outcomes are quality of communication and decision-making when approaching the end of life as perceived by patients and next of kin, and congruence between the patient’s preferences for information and involvement and the clinician’s perceptions of the same. For patients we will also collect clinical data and health register data. Additionally, all clinical staff in both arms will be invited to answer a questionnaire before and during the implementation period. To explore barriers and facilitators and further explore the significance of ACP, qualitative interviews will be performed in the intervention units with patients, next of kin, health care personnel and implementation teams, and with other stakeholders up to national level. Lastly, we will evaluate resource utilization, costs and health outcomes in a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Discussion
The project may contribute to improved implementation of ACP as well as valuable knowledge and methodological developments in the scientific fields of ACP, health service research and implementation science.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05681585. Registered 03.01.23.
Funder
The Research Council of Norway
University of Oslo
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Statistics Norway. Patient statistics 2012–2020. https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/10261. Accessed Oct 2023.
2. Graverholt B, Riise T, Jamtvedt G, Ranhoff AH, Krüger K, Nortvedt MW. Acute hospital admissions among nursing home residents: a population-based observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:126. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-126.
3. Melberg HOG, Geir, Gregersen FA. Hospital expenses towards the end of life. https://tidsskriftet.no/en/2013/04/hospital-expenses-towards-end-life (2013);8:133.
4. Bjørnelv G, Hagen TP, Forma L, Aas E. Care pathways at end-of-life for cancer decedents: registry based analyses of the living situation, healthcare utilization and costs for all cancer decedents in Norway in 2009–2013 during their last 6 months of life. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1221. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08526-w.
5. Pocock LV, Ives A, Pring A, Verne J, Purdy S. Factors associated with hospital deaths in the oldest old: a cross-sectional study. Age Ageing. 2016;45(3):372–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw019.