Author:
Morgan Debra,Kosteniuk Julie,O’Connell Megan E.,Seitz Dallas,Elliot Valerie,Bayly Melanie,Chow Amanda Froehlich,Cameron Chelsie
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aging of rural populations contributes to growing numbers of people with dementia in rural areas. Despite the key role of primary healthcare in rural settings there is limited research on effective models for dementia care, or evidence on sustaining and scaling them. The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing sustainability and scale-up of rural primary care based memory clinics from the perspective of healthcare providers involved in their design and delivery.
Methods
Participants were members of four interdisciplinary rural memory clinic teams in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan. A qualitative cross-sectional and retrospective study design was conducted. Data were collected via 6 focus groups (n = 40) and 16 workgroup meetings held with teams over 1 year post-implementation (n = 100). An inductive thematic analysis was used to identify themes.
Results
Eleven themes were identified (five that influenced both sustainability and scale-up, three related to sustainability, and three related to scale-up), encompassing team, organizational, and intervention-based factors. Factors that influenced both sustainability and scale-up were positive outcomes for patients and families, access to well-developed clinic processes and tools, a confident clinic leader-champion, facilitation by local facilitators and the researchers, and organizational and leadership support. Study findings revealed the importance of particular factors in the rural context, including facilitation to support team activities, a proven ready-to-use model, continuity of team members, and mentoring.
Conclusions
Interdisciplinary models of dementia care are feasible in rural settings if the right conditions and supports are maintained. Team-based factors were key to sustaining and scaling the innovation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Willis CD, Riley BL, Stockton L, Abramowicz A, Zummach D, Wong G, et al. Scaling up complex interventions: insights from a realist synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0158-4.
2. Stirman SW, Miller CJ, Toder K, Calloway A. Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-65.
3. Feldman HH, Estabrooks CA. The Canadian dementia challenge: ensuring optimal care and services for those at risk or with dementia throughout the country. Can J Public Health. 2017; https://doi.org/10.17269/CJPH.108.5852.
4. Lourida I, Abbott RA, Rogers M, Lang IA, Stein K, Kent B, et al. Dissemination and implementation research in dementia care: a systematic scoping review and evidence map. BMC Geriatr. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0528-y.
5. Auer S, Ratajczak P, Span E, Höfler M. Timely diagnosis of dementia in rural areas of Austria: the dementia service Centre model. In: Innes A, Farmer J, Morgan D, editors. Rural and remote dementia care: policy, research, and practice. Bristol: Policy Press; 2020. p. 103–26.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献