Author:
Barish Nicole,Barth Shannon,Monroe Anne K.,Greenberg Alan E.,Castel Amanda D.,Rakhmanina Natella,Barnes Clover,Serlin Michael,Kumar Princy,Temprosa Marinella,Bhandaru Vinay,Bezabeh Tsedenia,Grover Nisha,Mele Lisa,Reamer Susan,Sapozhnikova Alla,Strylewicz Greg,Xiao Jiayang,Byrne Morgan,Hammerlund Shannon,Kulie Paige,Peterson James,Stewart Bianca,Ma Yan,Lucar Jose,Gajjala Jhansi L.,Rana Sohail,Horberg Michael,Fernandez Ricardo,Taylor Duane,Bordon Jose,Teferi Gebeyehu,Benator Debra,Denyer Rachel,Ruiz Maria Elena,Abbott Stephen,
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has created substantial interruptions in healthcare presenting challenges for people with chronic illnesses to access care and treatment services. We aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic on HIV care delivery by characterizing the pandemic-related impact on HIV clinic-level services and the mitigation strategies that were developed to address them.
Methods
The data comes from a site assessment survey conducted in the DC Cohort, an observational clinical cohort of PWH receiving care at 14 HIV outpatient clinics in Washington, D.C. Frequency counts and prevalence estimates of clinic-level survey responses about the impact of care delivery, COVID-19 testing, and vaccinations and mitigation strategies are presented.
Results
Clinics reported an increase in temporary clinic closures (n = 2), reduction in clinic hours (n = 5), telehealth utilization (n = 10), adoption of multi-month dispensation of antiretroviral (ARV) medication (n = 11) and alternative drug delivery via postal/courier service, home/community delivery or pick-up (n = 11). Clinics utilized strategies for PWH who were lost to follow-up during the pandemic including offering care to persons with any income level and insurance status (n = 9), utilizing e-prescribing for auto refills even if the patient missed visits (n = 8), and utilization of the regional health information exchange to check for hospitalizations of PWH lost to follow-up (n = 8). Most social services offered before the pandemic remained available during the pandemic; however, some support services were modified.
Conclusions
Our findings demonstrate the extent of pandemic-era disruptions and the use of clinic-level mitigation strategies among urban HIV clinics. These results may help prepare for future pandemic or public health emergencies that disrupt healthcare delivery and access.
Funder
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. Fast-track: ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030. Geneva: UNAIDS; 2014.
2. Gatechompol S, Avihingsanon A, Putcharoen O, Ruxrungtham K, Kuritzkes DR. COVID-19 and HIV infection co-pandemics and their impact: a review of the literature. AIDS Res Ther. 2021;18(1):28.
3. WHO. Disruption in HIV, Hepatitis and STI services due to COVID-19. 2020 [cited 2022 May 4]. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/hiv-hq/disruption-hiv-hepatitis-sti-services-due-to-covid19.pdf?sfvrsn=5f78b742_8
4. Kowalska JD, Skrzat-Klapaczyńska A, Bursa D, Balayan T, Begovac J, Chkhartishvili N, et al. HIV care in times of the COVID-19 crisis — Where are we now in Central and Eastern Europe? Int J Infect Dis. 2020;96:311–4.
5. Pinto RM, Park S. COVID-19 Pandemic Disrupts HIV Continuum of Care and Prevention: Implications for Research and Practice Concerning Community-Based Organizations and Frontline Providers. AIDS Behav. 2020;24(9):2486–9.