Measuring performance in allied health professional role substitution models of care: a clinician survey

Author:

Mutsekwa Rumbidzai N.ORCID,Campbell Katrina L.ORCID,Canavan RussellORCID,Angus Rebecca L.ORCID,McBride Liza-JaneORCID,Byrnes Joshua M.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Professional role substitution models of care have emerged as a key strategy to address increasing healthcare demand. Gaining insights from those actively engaged in the process of these models’ implementation and evaluation is pivotal to ensuring sustainability and further successful implementation. The purpose of this study was to describe allied-health clinicians’ perceptions, practice, and experiences of healthcare performance evaluation in professional role substitution models of care. Methods Data were collected via an online platform between 22 June − 22 July 2022 using a combination of convenience and network-based sampling of allied-health clinicians involved or interested in the implementation and evaluation of professional role substitution models of care. Clinicians answered 25 questions which consisted of demographic and targeted questions regarding performance evaluation across six domains of healthcare quality (effectiveness, safety, appropriateness, access & equity, continuity of care, and cost, efficiency, productivity & sustainability). Results A total of 102 clinicians accessed the survey, with 72 providing complete survey data. Eleven allied-health professions were represented, working across twelve specialities in thirteen hospital and health services. Whilst most allied-health clinicians (93–100%) supported measuring performance in each of the six healthcare quality domains, only 26–58% were measuring these domains in practice. Allied-health leadership support (62.5%), clinician drive (62.5%), consumer engagement (50%) and medical support (46%) were enablers whilst a lack of resources (human, time, financial (47%)), healthcare performance frameworks and/or policies (40%) were identified as barriers. Given the opportunity, clinicians would invest the most financial resources in digital solutions as a core strategy to improve performance evaluation. Conclusions Allied-health professionals expressed strong support for principles of performance evaluation, however in practice, performance evaluation is still in its infancy in professional role substitution models of care. Organisations can implement strategies that maximise the enablers whilst addressing barriers identified to improve performance evaluation in these models of care.

Funder

Gold Coast Hospital and Health ServiceCollaborative Research Grant

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference30 articles.

1. Queensland Health Allied Health Professions’ Office of Queensland. Ministerial Taskforce on health practitioner expanded scope of practice: final report. 2014. Available from: https://www.health.qld.gov.au/ahwac/html/hpmintaskforce. Accessed 17 Dec 2023.

2. Duckett SJ. Health workforce design for the 21st century. Aust Health Rev. 2005;29(2):201–10.

3. Segal L, Bolton T. Issues facing the future health care workforce: the importance of demand modelling. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6(1):12.

4. Porter ME, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2013;91(10):1–19.

5. Baker A. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century: BMJ. 2001.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3