Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aims to explore and identify the organizational attributes that contribute to learning and improvement capabilities (L&IC) in healthcare organizations. The authors define learning as a structured update of system properties based on new information, and improvement as a closer correspondence between actual and desired standards. They highlight the importance of learning and improvement capabilities in maintaining high-quality care, and emphasize the need for empirical research on organizational attributes that contribute to these capabilities. The study has implications for healthcare organizations, professionals, and regulators in understanding how to assess and enhance learning and improvement capabilities.
Methods
A systematic search of peer-reviewed articles published between January 2010 and April 2020 was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and APA PsycINFO databases. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts and conducted a full-text review of potentially relevant articles, eventually adding five more studies identified through reference scanning. Finally, a total of 32 articles were included in this review. We extracted the data about organizational attributes that contribute to learning and improvement, categorized them and grouped the findings step-by-step into higher, more general-level categories using an interpretive approach until categories emerged that were sufficiently different from each other while also being internally consistent. This synthesis has been discussed by the authors.
Results
We identified five attributes that contribute to the L&IC of healthcare organizations: perceived leadership commitment, open culture, room for team development, initiating and monitoring change, and strategic client focus, each consisting of multiple facilitating aspects. We also found some hindering aspects.
Conclusions
We have identified five attributes that contribute to L&IC, mainly related to organizational software elements. Only a few are identified as organizational hardware elements. The use of qualitative methods seems most appropriate to understand or assess these organizational attributes. We feel it is also important for healthcare organisations to look more closely at how clients can be involved in L&IC.
Trial registration
Not applicable.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2001.
2. Adler PS, Riley P, Kwon S-W, et al. Performance improvement capability: keys to accelerating performance improvement in hospitals. Calif Manag Rev. 2003;45(2):12–33.
3. Pross C, Busse R, Geissler A. Hospital quality variation matters - a time-trend and cross-section analysis of outcomes in german hospitals from 2006 to 2014. Health Policy. 2017;121(8):842–52.
4. Williams SC, Morton DJ, Braun BI, et al. Comparing public quality ratings for accredited and nonaccredited nursing homes. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(1):24–9.
5. Steenhuis S, Groeneweg N, Koolman X, et al. Good, better, best? A comprehensive comparison of healthcare providers’ performance: an application to physiotherapy practices in primary care. Health Policy. 2017;121(12):1225–32.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献