Author:
Brennan Alana T.,Lauren Evelyn,Bor Jacob,George Jaya A.,Chetty Kamy,Mlisana Koleka,Dai Andrew,Khoza Siyabonga,Rosen Sydney,Stokes Andrew C.,Raal Frederick,Hibberd Patricia,Alexanian Sara M.,Fox Matthew P.,Crowther Nigel J.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Research out of South Africa estimates the total unmet need for care for those with type 2 diabetes mellitus (diabetes) at 80%. We evaluated the care cascade using South Africa’s National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) database and assessed if HIV infection impacts progression through its stages.
Methods
The cohort includes patients from government facilities with their first glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or plasma glucose (fasting (FPG); random (RPG)) measured between January 2012 to March 2015 in the NHLS. Lab-diagnosed diabetes was defined as HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, FPG ≥ 7.0mmol/l, or RPG ≥ 11.1mmol/l. Cascade stages post diagnosis were retention-in-care and glycaemic control (defined as an HbA1c < 7.0% or FPG < 8.0mmol/l or RPG < 10.0mmol/l) over 24-months. We estimated gaps at each stage nationally and by people living with HIV (PLWH) and without (PLWOH).
Results
Of the 373,889 patients tested for diabetes, 43.2% had an HbA1c or blood glucose measure indicating a diabetes diagnosis. Amongst those with lab-diagnosed diabetes, 30.9% were retained-in-care (based on diabetes labs) and 8.7% reached glycaemic control by 24-months. Prevalence of lab-diagnosed diabetes in PLWH was 28.6% versus 47.3% in PLWOH. Among those with lab-diagnosed diabetes, 34.3% of PLWH were retained-in-care versus 30.3% PLWOH. Among people retained-in-care, 33.8% of PLWH reached glycaemic control over 24-months versus 28.6% of PLWOH.
Conclusions
In our analysis of South Africa's NHLS database, we observed that 70% of patients diagnosed with diabetes did not maintain in consistent diabetes care, with fewer than 10% reaching glycemic control within 24 months. We noted a disparity in diabetes prevalence between PLWH and PLWOH, potentially linked to different screening methods. These differences underscore the intricacies in care but also emphasize how HIV care practices could guide better management of chronic diseases like diabetes. Our results underscore the imperative for specialized strategies to bolster diabetes care in South Africa.
Funder
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Statistics South Africa. Mortality and causes of death in South Africa, 2018: Findings from death notification. Statistical release. Accessed 1 June 2022. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P03093/P030932018.pdf.
2. International Diabetes Foundation. Accessed 1 June 2022.
https://idf.org/our-network/regions-members/africa/members/25-south-africa.html.
3. Manne-Goehler J, Geldsetzer P, Agoudavi K, et al. Health system performance for people with diabetes in 28 low- and middle-income countries: a cross-sectional study of nationally representative surveys. PLoS Med. 2019;16(3):e1002751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002751. Published 2019 Mar 1.
4. Stokes A, Berry KM, Mchiza Z, et al. Prevalence and unmet need for diabetes care across the care continuum in a national sample of South African adults: evidence from the SANHANES-1, 2011–2012. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0184264. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184264. Published 2017 Oct 2.
5. Perlman DC, Jordan AE, Nash D. Conceptualizing care continua: lessons from HIV, hepatitis C Virus, tuberculosis and implications for the development of improved care and prevention continua. Front Public Health. 2017;4:296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00296.