Author:
Wergeland Nina Camilla,Fause Åshild,Weber Astrid Karine,Fause Anett Beatrix Osnes,Riley Henriette
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Capacity-based mental health legislation was introduced in Norway on 1 September 2017. The aim was to increase the autonomy of patients with severe mental illness and to bring mental health care in line with human rights.
The aim of this study is to explore patient experiences of how far the new legislation has enabled them to be involved in decisions on their treatment after they were assessed as capable of giving consent and had their community treatment order (CTO) revoked due to the change in the legislation.
Method
Individual in-depth interviews were conducted from September 2019 to March 2020 with twelve people with experience as CTO patients. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis inspired by hermeneutics.
Results
Almost all interviewees were receiving the same health care over two years after their CTO was terminated. Following the new legislation, they found it easier to be involved in treatment decisions when off a CTO than they had done in periods without a CTO before the amendment. Being assessed as having capacity to consent had enhanced their autonomy, their dialogues and their feeling of being respected in encounters with health care personnel. However, several participants felt insecure in such encounters and some still felt passive and lacking in initiative due to their previous experiences of coercion. They were worried about becoming acutely ill and again being subjected to involuntary treatment.
Conclusion
The introduction of capacity-based mental health legislation seems to have fulfilled the intention that treatment and care should, as far as possible, be provided in accordance with patients’ wishes. Systematic assessment of capacity to consent seems to increase the focus on patients’ condition, level of functioning and opinions in care and treatment. Stricter requirements for health care providers to find solutions in cooperation with patients seem to lead to new forms of collaboration between patients and health care personnel, where patients have become more active participants in their own treatment and receive help to make more informed choices.
Funder
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). New York: United Nations; 2006. https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf Accessed 24 Jun 2021.
2. Szmukler G, Kelly BD. We should replace conventional mental health law with capacity-based law. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;209(6):449–53.
3. Newton-Howes G, Ryan CJ. The use of community treatment orders in competent patients is not justified. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210(5):311–2.
4. Norwegian Directorate of Health and Social Affairs. Tiltaksplan for redusert og kvalitetssikret bruk av tvang (IS-1370) [Action plan to reduce and quality assure the use of coercion]. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate of Health and Social Affairs; 2006. https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/x_ryddekatalog/tiltaksplan_for_redu_10902a-liten.pdf Accessed 24 Jun 2021.
5. Norwegian Official Report NOU 2011:9. Økt selvbestemmelse og rettsikkerhet. Balansegang mellom selvbestemmelsesrett og omsorgsansvar i psykisk helsevern [Greater self-determination and legal protection. Balancing self-determination and responsibility for care in mental health services]. Oslo: Information Departement, Ministry Service Center
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献