Victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience

Author:

Wong Eunice,Mavondo Felix,Horvat Lidia,McKinlay Louise,Fisher Jane

Abstract

Abstract Background Patient experience is recognised as a quality of care indicator and increasingly health services are working on achieving set targets and improving their performance. Interventions at the point of care targeting communication with patients, patient engagement in care processes and discharge planning are associated with better patient experience. However, their efficacy and application to different contexts are still unclear. The aims were to describe the interventions implemented by health services to improve patient experience, their impact on overall patient experiences and specific experiences in areas of communication, discharge planning, patient education on treatment/tests, the physical environment and access to care. Methods Secondary data analysis of the Victorian Healthcare Experience inpatient surveys reported in September 2016 and 2018 and content analysis of interventions published in the Victorian Quality Account for 2017 from 59 public health services in Victoria, Australia. The interventions were categorised using an adapted taxonomy of professional interventions by the Cochrane EPOC Review Group. Univariate tests and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to test measure invariance across the 2016 and 2018 groups and examine the association between each of the intervention categories on overall patient experience measure and specific outcome measures. Results This study found that the overall patient experience was consistent (93%) between 2016 and 2018 samples. In comparing impact, a single intervention rather than none or multiple interventions in communication, respect and dignity and treatment and disease education areas were associated with a higher level of the overall patient experience. Interventions in waiting time, access to service, care continuity and emotional support categories were associated with a decrease in overall patient experience. Conclusion This study found that to improve the overall patient experience, more focus is needed on evidence-based interventions in dignity and respect and emotional support. Furthermore, the choice of interventions should be guided by evidence of their efficacy and prioritising implementing one intervention well, provides more gains.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference50 articles.

1. Agency for Health and Research and Quality. What is Patient Experience [Internet]. [cited 2018 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/patient-experience/index.html

2. Ahmed F, Burt J, Roland M. Measuring Patient Experience: Concepts and Methods. Patient. 2014;7(3):235–41 Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40271-014-0060-5 [cited 2019 30 Aug].

3. Wolf J, Niederhauser V, Marshburn D, LaVela S. Defining patient experience. Patient Exp J. 2014:1 Available from: https://pxjournal.org/journal/vol1/iss1/3 [cited 2019 20 Jan].

4. Stoelwinder JU. Final report of the National Health and hospitals reform commission: will we get the health care governance reform we need? Med J Aust. 2009;191(7):387–8. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02846.x.

5. De Silva D. Helping people share decision making. London: The Health Foundation; 2012. 1–13 p. Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/public/cms/75/76/313/3448/HelpingPeopleShareDecisionMaking.pdf?realName=rFVU5h.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3