Abstract
Abstract
Background
Limited Health Literacy (HL) is an obstacle to accessing and receiving optimal health care and negatively impacts patients’ quality of life, thus making it an urgent issue in the health care system. Visual-based interventions are a promising strategy to improve HL through the use of visual aids and pictorial materials to explain health-related concepts. However, a comprehensive summary of the literature on the topic is still scarce.
Methods
To fill this gap, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim to determine the effectiveness of visual-based interventions in improving comprehension of health related material in the clinical population. Independent studies evaluating the effectiveness of visual-based interventions on adults (> 18 years) and whose primary outcome was either health literacy (HL) or comprehension were eligible for the review. After a systematic literature search was carried out in five databases, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria and thus were included. Most of the studies were randomized controlled trials and they focused on HL and health knowledge as outcomes.
Results
The review and meta-analysis showed that visual-based interventions were most effective in enhancing the comprehension of health-related material compared to traditional methods. According to meta-analytic results, videos are more effective than traditional methods (Z = 5.45, 95% CI [0.35, 0.75], p < 0.00001) and than the employment of written material (Z = 7.59, 95% CI [0.48, 0.82], p < 0.00001). Despite this, no significant difference was found between video and oral discussion (Z = 1.70, 95% CI [-0.46, 0.53], p = 0.09).
Conclusions
We conclude that visual-based interventions, particularly the ones using videos, are effective for improving HL and the comprehension of health-related material.
Funder
Swiss National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Ratzan S, Parker R, Selden C, Zorn M. National library of medicine current bibliographies in medicine: health literacy. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 2000.
2. Levy H, Janke A. Health literacy and access to care. J Health Commun. 2016;21(Suppl 1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1131776.
3. Baccolini V, Rosso A, Di Paolo C, Isonne C, Salerno C, Migliara G, Prencipe GP, Massimi A, Marzuillo C, De Vito C, Villari P, Romano F. What is the prevalence of low health literacy in European Union Member States? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(3):753–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06407-8.
4. Kutner M, Greenburg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. NCES 2006–483. In National Center for Education Statistics. ED Pubs, P. 2006. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED493284.
5. Lopez C, Kim B, Sacks K. Health literacy in the United States: enhancing assessments and reducing disparities. SSRN. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4182046.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献