Understanding the value of a doctorate for allied health professionals in practice in the UK: a survey
-
Published:2024-05-02
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1472-6963
-
Container-title:BMC Health Services Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Health Serv Res
Author:
Watson Jo,Robertson Steven,Ryan Tony,Wood Emily,Cooke Jo,Hampshaw Susan,Roddam Hazel
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The need to transform the United Kingdom’s (UK) delivery of health and care services to better meet population needs and expectations is well-established, as is the critical importance of research and innovation to drive those transformations. Allied health professionals (AHPs) represent a significant proportion of the healthcare workforce. Developing and expanding their skills and capabilities is fundamental to delivering new ways of working. However, career opportunities combining research and practice remain limited. This study explored the perceived utility and value of a doctorate to post-doctoral AHPs and how they experience bringing their research-related capabilities into practice environments.
Methods
With a broadly interpretivist design, a qualitatively oriented cross-sectional survey, with closed and open questions, was developed to enable frequency reporting while focusing on the significance and meaning participants attributed to the topic. Participants were recruited via professional networks and communities of practice. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse closed question responses, while combined framework and thematic analysis was applied to open question responses.
Results
Responses were received from 71 post-doctoral AHPs located across all four UK nations. Findings are discussed under four primary themes of utilisation of the doctorate; value of the doctorate; impact on career, and impact on self and support. Reference is also made at appropriate points to descriptive statistics summarising closed question responses.
Conclusion
The findings clearly articulate variability of experiences amongst post-doctoral AHPs. Some were able to influence team and organisational research cultures, support the development of others and drive service improvement. The challenges, barriers and obstacles encountered by others reflect those that have been acknowledged for many years. Acknowledging them is important, but the conversation must move forward and generate positive action to ensure greater consistency in harnessing the benefits and value-added these practitioners bring. If system-wide transformation is the aim, it is inefficient to leave navigating challenges to individual creativity and tenacity or forward-thinking leaders and organisations. There is an urgent need for system-wide responses to more effectively, consistently and equitably enable career pathways combining research and practice for what is a substantial proportion of the UK healthcare workforce.
Funder
National Institute for Health Research Collaboration and Leadership for Allied Health and Care Research for Yorkshire and Humber
Health Education England
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Department of Health and Social Care. The NHS Long Term Plan. 2019. Available at: NHS Long Term Plan » The NHS Long Term Plan Accessed 21/01/2023.
2. Department of Health and Social Care. The Future of Clinical Research Delivery: 2022 to 2025 implementation plan. 2022. Available at: The Future of Clinical Research Delivery: 2022 to 2025 implementation plan - GOV.UK Accessed 01/02/2023.
3. National Health Service England. The Allied Health Professions (AHPs) strategy for England – AHPs Deliver. 2022. Available at: NHS England » The Allied Health Professions (AHPs) strategy for England – AHPs Deliver Accessed 21/01/2023.
4. National Health Service England. We are the NHS: People Plan for 2020/21 – action for us all. 2020. Available at: NHS England » We are the NHS: People Plan for 2020/21 – action for us all Accessed 21/01/2023.
5. Jones D, Keenan A-M. The rise and rise of NMAHPs in UK clinical research. Future Healthc J. 2021;8:2:e195–7. https://doi.org/10.7861/fhj.2021-0098.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. A new tool to support research capability building;British Journal of Occupational Therapy;2024-08-16