Author:
Rich Rebecca,D’Hont Thomsen,Murphy Kellie E.,Veillard Jeremy,Chatwood Susan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Meaningful performance measurement requires indicators to be scientifically robust and strategically focused. For many circumpolar states, indicators aligned with national strategies may ignore the priorities of northern, remote, or Indigenous populations. The aim of this project was to identify contextually appropriate performance indicators for maternity care in circumpolar regions.
Methods
Fourteen maternity care and health systems experts participated in a modified Delphi consensus process. The list of proposed indicators was derived from a previously published scoping review. Fourteen participants rated each proposed indicator according to importance, circumpolar relevance, validity, and reliability and suggested additional indicators for consideration.
Results
Consensus was achieved after two rounds, as measured by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87. Eleven indicators, many of which represented physical health outcomes, were ranked highly on all four criteria. Twenty-nine additional indicators, largely focused on social determinants of health, health care responsiveness, and accessibility, were identified for further research. Travel for care, cultural safety and upstream structural determinants of health were identified as important themes.
Conclusions
This study identified the important gaps between current performance measurement strategies and the context and values that permeate maternal-child health in circumpolar regions. The indicators identified in this study provide an important foundation for ongoing work. We recommend that future work encompass an appreciation for the intersectoral nature of social, structural, and colonial determinants of maternal-child health in circumpolar regions.
Funder
Canadian Institutes for Health Research
Canadian Foundation for Women’s Health
Canadian Institutes of Health Research – Strategy for Patient Oriented Research patient engagement
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Carinci F, Van Gool K, Mainz J, Veillard J, Pichora E, Januel J, et al. Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015;27(2):137–46.
2. Freeman T. Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature. Health Serv Manag Res. 2002;15(2):126–37.
3. Murray C, Evans D. Health systems performance assessment: debates, methods and empiricism. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
4. Smith PC, Mossialos E, Papanicolas I. Performance measurement for health system improvement: experiences, challenges and prospects. 2008.
5. Brown AD, Veillard J. Commentary. Indicators with a Purpose–Meaningful Performance Measurement and the Importance of Strategy. Healthcare Policy. 2008;3(4):49.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献