Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) legalized abortion in 2018 to preserve health and pledged to provide quality postabortion care (PAC), yet little is known about the availability of abortion care services and if facilities are prepared to provide them; even less is known about the accessibility of these services. Using facility and population-based data in Kinshasa and Kongo Central, this study examined the availability of abortion services, readiness of facilities to provide them, and inequities in access.
Methods
Data on 153 facilities from the 2017–2018 DRC Demographic and Health Survey Service Provision Assessment (SPA) were used to examine signal functions and readiness of facilities to provide services across three abortion care domains (termination of pregnancy, basic treatment of abortion complications, and comprehensive treatment of abortion complications). To examine PAC and medication abortion provision before and after abortion decriminalization, we compared estimates from the 2017–2018 SPA facilities to estimates from the Performance Monitoring for Action (PMA) data collected in 2021 (n = 388). Lastly, we assessed proximity to PAC and medication abortion using PMA by geospatially linking facilities to representative samples of 2,326 and 1,856 women in Kinshasa and Kongo Central, respectively.
Results
Few facilities had all the signal functions under each abortion care domain, but most facilities had many of the signal functions: overall readiness scores were > 60% for each domain. In general, readiness was higher among referral facilities compared to primary facilities. The main barriers to facility readiness were stock shortages of misoprostol, injectable antibiotics, and contraception. Overall, provision of services was higher post-decriminalization. Access to facilities providing PAC and medication abortion was almost universal in urban Kinshasa, but patterns in rural Kongo Central showed a positive association with education attainment and wealth.
Conclusion
Most facilities had many of the necessary signal functions to provide abortion services, but the majority experienced challenges with commodity availability. Inequities in accessibility of services also existed. Interventions that address supply chain challenges may improve facility readiness to provide abortion care services, and further efforts are needed to narrow the gap in accessibility, especially among poor women from rural settings.
Funder
Anonymous Donor
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. World Health Organization [WHO]. Abortion [Fact sheet] [Internet]. 2021 Nov. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion.
2. Ganatra B, Gerdts C, Rossier C, Johnson BR, Tunçalp Ö, Assifi A et al. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14: estimates from a bayesian hierarchical model. The Lancet 2017 Nov 25;390(10110):2372–81.
3. Bankole A, Remez L, Owolabi O, Philbin J, Williams P. From unsafe to safe abortion in Sub-Saharan Africa: slow but steady progress [Internet]. New York, NY: Guttmacher Institute; 2020 [cited 2022 Feb 28]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1363/2020.32446.
4. African Commission on Human and People’s Rights [ACHPR]. Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa | African Union [Internet]. African Union; 2003 [cited 2022 Sep 21]. Available from: https://au.int/en/treaties/protocol-african-charter-human-and-peoples-rights-rights-women-africa.
5. United Nations Population Fund [UNFPA]. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, 5–13 September 1994 [Internet]. 1995 [cited 2022 Sep 12]. Report No.: A/CONF.171/13/Rev.1. Available from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4a54bc080.html.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献